Standardised patient education in adrenal insufficiency: a prospective multi-centre evaluation
Abstract
Objective Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) suffer from impaired quality of life and are at risk of adrenal crisis (AC) despite established replacement therapy. Patient education is regarded an important measure for prevention of AC and improvement of AI management. A standardized education programme was elaborated for patients with chronic AI in Germany. Design Longitudinal, prospective, questionnaire-based, multi-centre study. Methods During 2-h sessions, patients (n = 526) were provided with basic knowledge on AI, equipped with emergency cards and sets and trained in self-injection of hydrocortisone. To evaluate the education programme, patients from eight certified centres completed questionnaires before, immediately after and 6-9 months after training. Results 399 completed data sets were available for analysis. Questionnaire score-values were significantly higher after patient education, indicating successful knowledge transfer (baseline: 17 ± 7.1 of a maximum score of 29; after training: 23 ± 4.2; P Conclusion Patient group education in chronic AI represents a helpful tool for the guidance of patients, their self-assurance and their knowledge on prevention of adrenal crises. Repeated training and adaptation to specific needs, for example, of older patients is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Burger-Stritt, S., Eff, A., Quinkler, M., Kienitz, T., Stamm, B., Willenberg, H. S., Meyer, G., Klein, J., Reisch, N., Droste, M., & Hahner, S.
- Affiliations
- 1Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
- 2Endocrinology in Charlottenburg, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- 4Medical practice for Endocrinology, Saarbrücken, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE)
- University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
- 7Medical Practice for Endocrinology, Lübeck, Germany
- LMU Klinikum (DE)
- 9Medical Practice for Endocrinology & Diabetes, Oldenburg, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Hahner, Stefanie
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-127
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W3036289893
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- adrenal insufficiency, patient education, adrenal crisis prevention, knowledge transfer, quality of life, patient self-confidence, Addison's disease, secondary adrenal insufficiency
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adrenal Insufficiency, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Medical Tags, Emergency Treatment, Female, Germany, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Administration, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review