Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proinsulin, C-peptide, and insulin in normal subjects during an 8-h hyperglycemic clamp

Hartling, Svend G, Røder, Michael E, Dinesen, Bo, Binder, Christian·1996·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Hartling SG, Røder ME, Dinesen B, Binder C. Proinsulin C-peptide, and insulin in normal subjects during an 8-h hyperglycemic clamp. Eur J Endocrinol 1996;134:197–200. ISSN 0804–4643 Increased concentrations of proinsulin immunoreactive material (PIM) absolutely or relative to insulin is a characteristic finding in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The aim of this study was to test if 8 h or mild hyperglycemia (7–9 nmol/l in healthy subjects could induce a preferential secretion of PIM from B cells. Serum concentrations of insulin, C-peptide and PIM were measured every 10 min during the 8 h of continuous glucose infusion in nine normal-weight healthy subjects without diabetes among their first-degree relatives. After a gradual rise in B-cell peptides, a steady state was reached. From 4 to 8 h no further difference in insulin, C-peptide or PIM concentration was found. Fasting PIM/C-peptide and PIM/insulin ratios of 0.5% and 2.3% increased during the glucose clamp to levels of 1.4% and 7.6%, respectively. Neither testing the regression slope nor comparing individual time points showed any significant difference for the PIM/C-peptide ratio from 2 to 8 h and for the PIM/insulin ratio from 3 to 8 h. These results do not support the hypothesis that an increased glucose drive per se results in an altered B-cell function with increasing PIM/Cpeptide ratio. At least 8 h of mild hyperglycemia in healthy subjects does not progressively alter B-cell function. Svend Hartling, Department of Internal Medicine, Sundby Hospital, Italiensvej 1, DK-2300 Sundby, Denmark

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje.0.1340197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hartling, S. G., Røder, M. E., Dinesen, B., & Binder, C.
Corresponding author
Hartling, Svend G
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
1996-02
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
197-200
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W1975893616
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
proinsulin, C-peptide, insulin, hyperglycemic clamp, beta-cell function, type 2 diabetes, healthy volunteers, glucose infusion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, C-Peptide, Female, Glucose, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Proinsulin, Glucose Clamp Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.