The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in 'cold' thyroid nodules
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to establish the usefulness of conventional thyroid ultrasonography (US) and color flow-doppler (CFD) sonography in the assessment of 'cold' thyroid nodules. One hundred and four consecutive patients with thyroid nodules who were to undergo surgery were examined by US and CFD before thyroidectomy. Conventional US evaluated the presence of a halo sign, hypoechogenicity and microcalcifications. The vascular pattern on CFD was classified as follows: Type I, absence of blood flow; Type II, perinodular blood flow; Type III, marked intranodular blood flow. On histology, 30 nodules were diagnosed as malignant (carcinoma, CA) and 74 as benign nodules (BN). On US, the echographic pattern most predictive for malignancy was absent halo sign, which was found in 20/30 CA and in 17/72 BN (P = 0.0001; specificity 77.0%; sensitivity 66.6%). The most specific combination on US, absent halo sign/microcalcifications, was found in 8/30 CA and in 5/74 BN (P < 0.005; specificity 93.2%, sensitivity 26.6%). The Type III pattern on CFD was found in 20/30 CA and 38/74 BN (not statistically significant). The combination of absent halo sign on US with Type III pattern on CFD was found in 15/30 CA and in 8/74 BN (P < 0.0001; specificity 89.0%, sensitivity 50.0%). The combination of absent halo sign/microcalcifications on US with Type III pattern on CFD was the most specific combination of the two techniques, being found in 5/30 CA and in only 2/74 BN (P < 0.01; specificity 97.2%, sensitivity 16.6%). In conclusion, findings on US and CFD become highly predictive for malignancy only when multiple signs are simultaneously present in a thyroid nodule. Thus the predictive value of these techniques increases at the expense of their sensitivity. Only in a small proportion of patients with thyroid carcinoma is US and CFD information highly predictive of malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Remonti, L. R., Kramer, C. K., Leitão, C. B., Pinto, L. C. F., & Gross, J. L. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0353 · Cited by 411
Ha, E. J., Chung, S. R., Na, D. G., Ahn, H. S., Chung, J., Lee, J. Y., Park, J. S., Yoo, R.-E., Baek, J. H., Baek, S. M., et al. (2021) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2021.0713 · Cited by 298
Bogazzi, F., Martino, E., Dell’Unto, E., Brogioni, S., Cosci, C., Aghini-Lombardi, F., Ceccarelli, C., Pinchera, A., Bartalena, L., & Braverman, L. E. (2003) · Journal of Endocrinological Investigation · doi:10.1007/bf03347021 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rago, T., Vitti, P., Chiovato, L., Mazzeo, S., De Liperi, A., Miccoli, P., Viacava, P., Bogazzi, F., Martino, E., & Pinchera, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-46
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2130045499
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in 'cold' thyroid nodules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje.0.1380041
- The paper
- Rago, T., Vitti, P., Chiovato, L., Mazzeo, S., De Liperi, A., Miccoli, P., Viacava, P., Bogazzi, F., Martino, E., & Pinchera, A. (1998). Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in 'cold' thyroid nodules. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1380041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.