Intrinsic imperfections of endocrine replacement therapy
Abstract
Hormonal substitution therapy has been extremely successful, with respect to morbidity and mortality, in the treatment of the major syndromes of endocrine insufficiency. However, many patients treated for endocrine insufficiencies still suffer from more or less vague complaints and a decreased quality of life. It is likely that these complaints are, at least in part, caused by intrinsic imperfections of hormone replacement strategies in mimicking normal hormone secretion. Unfortunately, these complaints are often difficult to assess by clinicometric or biochemical tests, because the effects of hormones in general, and thus of hormone replacement strategies in particular, are difficult to quantify at the tIssue level. Therefore, in clinical practice we rely mostly on plasma variables - 'plasma endocrinology' - which are a poor reflection of hormone action at the tIssue level. Appreciation of these intrinsic shortcomings of endocrine therapy is of utmost importance to prevent incorrect labelling of the complaints of many endocrine patients and to achieve further improvement in endocrine replacement strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complexity of these interactions is one of the important reasons for the inherent imperfections in endocrine replacements in hypopituitarism.
“The complexity of these interactions is one of the important reasons for the inherent imperfections in endocrine replacements in hypopituitarism (Romijn et al., 2003) and emphasizes the importance of special attention in patients with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies whenever replacements are introduced or dose adjusted.”
From The hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid (HPT)-axis and its role in physiology and pathophysiology of other hypothalamus-pituitary functions (2021) · cites this paper as Romijn et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Romijn, J., Smit, J., & Lamberts, S.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-97
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2126879257
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- hormone replacement therapy, endocrine insufficiency, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Hypogonadism, Hypoparathyroidism, Insulin, Growth Hormone, Thyroid Hormones, Hormone Replacement Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review