Interest of the Androgen Deficiency in Aging Males (ADAM) questionnaire for the identification of hypogonadism in elderly community-dwelling male volunteers
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To date, serum free testosterone measurement is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of hypogonadism in elderly males but it is not available to all subjects suspected of a decrease in testicular function. Therefore, we evaluated whether the Androgen Deficiency in Aging Males (ADAM) questionnaire, in its original or in a modified 'quantitative' version (qADAM), could be used as a surrogate to biochemical determinations for the identification of hypogonadism in elderly males. METHODS: 5028 men, aged 50-70 years, spontaneously consulting for the assessment of their gonadal function were studied. ADAM and qADAM, allocating a value of 1 point for any positive answer to each of the 10 questions of the ADAM test, were assessed for their ability to discriminate between males with free testosterone levels below or above 70 ng/l. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the ADAM score were 81% and 21.6% respectively. The use of ADAM resulted in an appropriate classification of our population in normal or hypogonadal subjects in 44.5% of the cases. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the qADAM (0.529) revealed a highly marginal interest of this quantitative approach compared with the original scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: The ADAM test has a high sensitivity to identify aging males with low free testosterone levels. However, due to its lack of specificity, this test cannot be used as a surrogate to serum free testosterone testing for the identification of androgen deficiency in elderly, community-dwelling males.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 102
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rhoden EL & Morgentaler A. Risk of testosterone-replacement therapy and recommendations for monitoring. New England Journal of Medicine 2004 350 482-492.
- Authors
- Tancredi, A., Reginster, J., Schleich, F., Pire, G., Maassen, P., Luyckx, F., & Legros, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Liège (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Tancredi, A
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-360
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2160639564
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orbi.uliege.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- Adam, hypogonadism, androgen deficiency, free testosterone, older men, community-dwelling men, questionnaire-based screening, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, surrogate markers
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Testosterone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review