The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous?
Abstract
The new WHO classification of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) implies that G3 neoplasms with mitotic index >20 and/or Ki67 index >20% are neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), described as poorly differentiated, small or large cell types, by analogy with lung NEC. To characterize the subgroup of non-small-cell-type GEP and thoracic NET with mitotic index >20 and/or Ki67 >20% according to their pathological features, response to cisplatin and overall survival (OS). We reviewed pathological and clinical presentation of G3 non-small-cell-type NET referred to our institution for 5 years. Data from 166 patients with metastatic thoracic and GEP-NET were collected. Twenty-eight patients (17%) fulfill the inclusion criteria. Tumors were classified as well-differentiated NET (G3-WDNET) in 42.8% of cases and poorly differentiated, large-cell NEC (G3-LCNEC) in 57.2% of cases. Plasma chromogranin A or neuron-specific enolase were elevated in 42 and 25% respectively of G3-WDNET and 31 and 50% of G3-LCNEC. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was positive in 88 and 50% of G3-WDNET or G3-LCNEC respectively. Complete or partial response to cisplatin was observed in 31% of cases, all classified as G3-LCNEC. The median OS was 41 months for G3-WDNET but 17 months for G3-LCNEC (P=0.34). Short survival was observed in 25% of G3-WDNET but 62.5% of G3-LCNEC patients (P=0.049). G3 ENETS GEP and thoracic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) could constitute a heterogeneous subgroup of NEN as regards diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. If confirmed, future classifications may consider splitting them into two groups according to their morphological differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Cited by
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Cives, M., & Strosberg, J. R. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21493 · Cited by 586
Tang, L. H., Basturk, O., Sue, J. J., & Klimstra, D. S. (2016) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000000662 · Cited by 382
Gastroenteropancreatic high‐grade neuroendocrine carcinoma
Sorbye, H., Strosberg, J., Baudin, E., Klimstra, D. S., & Yao, J. C. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28721 · Cited by 347
Self-citationvon Arx, C., Capozzi, M., López-Jiménez, E., Ottaiano, A., Tatangelo, F., Di Mauro, A., Nasti, G., Tornesello, M. L., & Tafuto, S. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8091277 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Vélayoudom-Céphise, F.-L., Duvillard, P., Foucan, L., Hadoux, J., Chougnet, C. N., Leboulleux, S., Malka, D., Guigay, J., Goere, D., Debaere, T., Caramella, C., Schlumberger, M., Planchard, D., Elias, D., Ducreux, M., Scoazec, J.-Y., & Baudin, E.
- Venue
- Endocrine-Related Cancer
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 2013-07-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 649-657
- ISSN
- 1351-0088 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-6821
- OpenAlex
- W2123060958
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/erc-13-0027
- The paper
- Vélayoudom-Céphise, F.-L., Duvillard, P., Foucan, L., Hadoux, J., Chougnet, C. N., Leboulleux, S., Malka, D., Guigay, J., Goere, D., Debaere, T., Caramella, C., Schlumberger, M., Planchard, D., Elias, D., Ducreux, M., Scoazec, J.-Y., & Baudin, E. (2013). Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocrine-Related Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-13-0027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.