Cited by 79Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCell death mechanisms and regulationCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Cell death response to anti-mitotic drug treatment in cell culture, mouse tumor model and the clinic

Open access
Shi, Jue, Mitchison, Timothy J·2017·Endocrine-Related Cancer

Abstract

Anti-mitotic cancer drugs include classic microtubule-targeting drugs, such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids, and the newer spindle-targeting drugs, such as inhibitors of the motor protein; Kinesin-5 (aka KSP, Eg5, KIF11); and Aurora-A, Aurora-B and Polo-like kinases. Microtubule-targeting drugs are among the first line of chemotherapies for a wide spectrum of cancers, but patient responses vary greatly. We still lack understanding of how these drugs achieve a favorable therapeutic index, and why individual patient responses vary. Spindle-targeting drugs have so far shown disappointing results in the clinic, but it is possible that certain patients could benefit if we understand their mechanism of action better. Pre-clinical data from both cell culture and mouse tumor models showed that the cell death response is the most variable point of the drug action. Hence, in this review we focus on current mechanistic understanding of the cell death response to anti-mitotics. We first draw on extensive results from cell culture studies, and then cross-examine them with the more limited data from animal tumor models and the clinic. We end by discussing how cell type variation in cell death response might be harnessed to improve anti-mitotic chemotherapy by better patient stratification, new drug combinations and identification of novel targets for drug development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/erc-17-0003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interphase effects of microtubule-targeting agents probably contribute to their clinical efficacy.

    “Although the perturbation of mitosis has long been regarded as the explanation for the anti-tumour effects of MTAs, drugs specifically targeting the formation of the mitotic spindle, such as kinesin-5 inhibitors, have shown disappointing results in the clinic, suggesting that the interphase effects of MTAs probably contribute to their clinical efficacy 11,12 .”

    From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The section “Clinical responses to microtubule-targeting vs. spindle-targeting anti-mitotic drugs” reports disappointing clinical results for spindle-targeting drugs and proposes interphase effects as one possible explanation. It says those effects may contribute to the effects of taxanes and vincas on solid tumors, but also offers an alternative explanation; it does not establish that interphase effects probably contribute to clinical efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 79

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. [1]Jordan MA Wilson L Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs Nat Rev Cancer 2004 4 253 65 15057285
  2. [2]Perez EA Microtubule inhibitors: Differentiating tubulin-inhibiting agents based on mechanisms of action, clinical activity, and resistance Mol Cancer Ther 2009 8 8 2086 95 19671735
  3. [3]Mukhtar E Adhami VM Mukhtar H Targeting microtubules by natural agents for cancer therapy Mol Cancer Ther 2014 13 2 275 84 24435445 PMC3946048
  4. [4]Stanton RA Gernert KM Nettles JH Aneja R Drugs that target dynamic microtubules: a new molecular perspective Med Res Rev 2011 31 3 443 81 21381049 PMC3155728
  5. [5]Crown J O’Leary M Ooi WS Docetaxel and paclitaxel in the treatment of breast cancer: a review of clinical experience Oncologist 2004 9 Suppl 2 24 32 15161988
  6. [6]Rebucci M Michiels C Molecular aspects of cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy Biochem Pharmacol 2013 85 9 1219 26 23435357
  7. [7]Rowinsky EK The development and clinical utility of the taxane class of antimicrotubule chemotherapy agents Annu Rev Med 1997 48 353 74 9046968
  8. [8]Canta A Chiorazzi A Cavaletti G Tubulin: a target for antineoplastic drugs into the cancer cells but also in the peripheral nervous system Curr Med Chem 2009 16 11 1315 24 19355888
  9. [9]Marzo I Naval J Antimitotic drugs in cancer chemotherapy: promises and pitfalls Biochem Pharmacol 2013 86 6 703 10 23886991
  10. [10]Jackson JR Patrick DR Dar MM Huang PS Targeted anti-mitotic therapies: can we improve on tubulin agents? Nat Rev Cancer 2007 7 2 107 17 17251917
  11. [11]Purcell JW Davis J Reddy M Martin S Samayoa K Vo H Thomsen K Bean P Kuo WL Ziyad S Billig J Feiler HS Gray JW Wood KW Cases S Activity of the kinesin spindle protein inhibitor ispinesib (SB-715992) in models of breast cancer Clin Cancer Res 2010 16 2 566 76 20068098 PMC2844774
  12. [13]Katayama H Sen S Aurora kinase inhibitors as anticancer molecules Biochim Biophys Acta 2010 1799 10–12 829 39 20863917 PMC4501772
  13. [14]Bavetsias V Linardopoulos S Aurora Kinase Inhibitors: Current Status and Outlook Front Oncol 2015 5 278 26734566 PMC4685048
  14. [15]McInnes C Wyatt MD PLK1 as an oncology target: current status and future potential Drug Discov Today 2011 16 13–14 619 25 21601650
  15. [16]Zasadil LM Andersen KA Yeum D Rocque GB Wilke LG Tevaarwerk AJ Raines RT Burkard ME Weaver BA Cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in breast cancer is due to chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles Sci Transl Med 2014 6 229 229ra43 PMC4176609 24670687
  16. [17]Weaver BA How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells Mol Biol Cell 2014 25 18 2677 81 25213191 PMC4161504
  17. [18]Shi J Orth JD Mitchison T Cell type variation in responses to antimitotic drugs that target microtubules and kinesin-5 Cancer Res 2008 68 3269 76 18451153
  18. [19]Orth JD Tang Y Shi J Loy CT Amendt C Wilm C Zenke FT Mitchison TJ Quantitative live imaging of cancer and normal cells treated with Kinesin-5 inhibitors indicates significant differences in phenotypic responses and cell fate Mol Cancer Ther 2008 7 3480 9 18974392 PMC2597169
  19. [20]Gascoigne KE Taylor SS Cancer cells display profound intra- and interline variation following prolonged exposure to antimitotic drugs Cancer Cell 2008 14 111 22 18656424
  20. [21]Shi J Zhou Y Huang HC Mitchison TJ Navitoclax (ABT-263) Accelerates Apoptosis during Drug-Induced Mitotic Arrest by Antagonizing Bcl-xL Cancer Res 2011 71 4518 26 21546570 PMC3129452
  21. [22]Zhu Y Zhou Y Shi J Post-slippage multinucleation renders cytotoxic variation in anti-mitotic drugs that target the microtubules or mitotic spindle Cell Cycle 2014 13 11 1756 64 24694730 PMC4111722
  22. [23]Lénárt P Petronczki M Steegmaier M Di Fiore B Lipp JJ Hoffmann M Rettig WJ Kraut N Peters JM The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1 Curr Biol 2007 17 4 304 15 17291761
  23. [24]Kaestner P Stolz A Bastians H Determinants for the efficiency of anticancer drugs targeting either aurora-A or aurora-B kinases in human colon carcinoma cells Mol Cancer Ther 2009 8 7 2046 56 19584233
  24. [25]Hauf S Cole RW LaTerra S Zimmer C Schnapp G Walter R Heckel A van Meel J Rieder CL Peters JM The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint J Cell Biol 2003 161 2 281 94 12707311 PMC2172906
  25. [26]Wilkinson RW Odedra R Heaton SP Wedge SR Keen NJ Crafter C Foster JR Brady MC Bigley A Brown E Byth KF Barrass NC Mundt KE Foote KM Heron NM Jung FH Mortlock AA Boyle FT Green S AZD1152, a selective inhibitor of Aurora B kinase, inhibits human tumor xenograft growth by inducing apoptosis Clin Cancer Res 2007 13 12 3682 8 17575233
  26. [27]Brito DA Rieder CL Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint Curr Biol 2006 16 12 1194 200 16782009 PMC2749311
  27. [28]Huang HC Mitchison TJ Shi J Stochastic competition between mechanistically independent slippage and death pathways determines cell fate during mitotic arrest PLoS One 2010 5 12 e15724 21203573 PMC3006339
  28. [29]Milross CG Mason KA Hunter NR Chung WK Peters LJ Milas L Relationship of mitotic arrest and apoptosis to antitumor effect of paclitaxel J Natl Cancer Inst 1996 88 1308 14 8797771
  29. [30]Woods CM Zhu J McQueney PA Bollag D Lazarides E Taxol-induced mitotic block triggers rapid onset of a p53-independent apoptotic pathway Mol Med 1995 1 5 506 26 8529117 PMC2229961
  30. [31]Wang LG Liu XM Kreis W Budman DR The effect of antimicrotubule agents on signal transduction pathways of apoptosis: a review Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999 44 5 355 361 10501907
  31. [32]Park SJ Wu CH Gordon JD Zhong X Emami A Safa AR Taxol induces caspase-10-dependent apoptosis J Biol Chem 2004 279 49 51057 67 15452117
  32. [33]Tao W South VJ Zhang Y Davide JP Farrell L Kohl NE Sepp-Lorenzino L Lobell RB Induction of apoptosis by an inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin KSP requires both activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint and mitotic slippage Cancer Cell 2005 8 1 49 59 16023598
  33. [34]Choi M Kim W Cheon MG Lee CW Kim JE Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor BI2536 causes mitotic catastrophe following activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint in non-small cell lung cancer cells Cancer Lett 2015 357 2 591 601 25524551
  34. [35]Broker LE Huisman C Span SW Rodriguez JA Kruyt FA Giaccone G Cathepsin B mediates caspase-independent cell death induced by microtubule stabilizing agents in non-small cell lung cancer cells Cancer Res 2004 64 1 27 30 14729603
  35. [36]Broker LE Kruyt FA Giaccone G Cell death independent of caspases: a review Clin Cancer Res 2005 11 9 3155 62 15867207
  36. [37]Harley ME Allan LA Sanderson HS Clarke PR Phosphorylation of Mcl-1 by CDK1-cyclin B1 initiates its Cdc20-dependent destruction during mitotic arrest EMBO J 2010 29 14 2407 20 20526282 PMC2910263
  37. [38]Tunquist BJ Woessner RD Walker DH Mcl-1 stability determines mitotic cell fate of human multiple myeloma tumor cells treated with the kinesin spindle protein inhibitor ARRY-520 Mol Cancer Ther 2010 9 7 2046 56 20571074
  38. [39]Wertz IE Kusam S Lam C Okamoto T Sandoval W Anderson DJ Helgason E Ernst JA Eby M Liu J Belmont LD Kaminker JS O’Rourke KM Pujara K Kohli PB Johnson AR Chiu ML Lill JR Jackson PK Fairbrother WJ Seshagiri S Ludlam MJ Leong KG Dueber EC Maecker H Huang DC Dixit VM Sensitivity to antitubulin chemotherapeutics is regulated by MCL1 and FBW7 Nature 2011 471 7336 110 4 21368834
  39. [40]Gottesfeld JM Forbes DJ Mitotic repression of the transcriptional machinery Trends Biochem Sci 1997 22 6 197 202 9204705
  40. [41]Blagosklonny MV Mitotic arrest and cell fate: why and how mitotic inhibition of transcription drives mutually exclusive events Cell Cycle 2007 6 70 4 17245109
  41. [42]Sivan G Elroy-Stein O Regulation of mRNA Translation during cellular division Cell Cycle 2008 7 741 4 18239464
  42. [43]Zhong Q Gao W Du F Wang X Mule/ARF-BP1, a BH3-only E3 ubiquitin ligase, catalyzes the polyubiquitination of Mcl-1 and regulates apoptosis Cell 2005 121 7 1085 95 15989957
  43. [44]Nijhawan D Fang M Traer E Zhong Q Gao W Du F Wang X Elimination of Mcl-1 is required for the initiation of apoptosis following ultraviolet irradiation Genes Dev 2003 17 12 1475 86 12783855 PMC196078
  44. [45]Adams KW Cooper GM Rapid turnover of Mcl-1 couples translation to cell survival and apoptosis J Biol Chem 2007 282 9 6192 200 17200126 PMC1831535
  45. [46]Topham C Tighe A Ly P Bennett A Sloss O Nelson L Ridgway RA Huels D Littler S Schandl C Sun Y Bechi B Procter DJ Sansom OJ Cleveland DW Taylor SS MYC Is a Major Determinant of Mitotic Cell Fate Cancer Cell 2015 28 1 129 40 26175417 PMC4518499
  46. [47]Bennett A Sloss O Topham C Nelson L Tighe A Taylor SS Inhibition of Bcl-xL sensitizes cells to mitotic blockers, but not mitotic drivers Open Biol 2016 6 8 pii 160134 PMC5008013 27512141
  47. [48]Tan N Malek M Zha J Kassees R Yue P Berry L Fairbrother W Sampath D Belmont LD Navitoclax Enhances the Efficacy of Taxanes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Models Clin Cancer Res 2011 17 6 1394 404 21220478
  48. [50]Enserink JM Kolodner RD An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes Cell Div 2010 5 11 20465793 PMC2876151
  49. [51]Huang HC Shi J Orth JD Mitchison TJ Evidence that mitotic exit is a better cancer therapeutic target than spindle assembly Cancer Cell 2009 16 4 347 58 19800579 PMC2758291
  50. [52]Manchado E Guillamot M de Cárcer G Eguren M Trickey M García-Higuera I Moreno S Yamano H Cañamero M Malumbres M Targeting mitotic exit leads to tumor regression in vivo: Modulation by Cdk1, Mastl, and the PP2A/B55α,δ phosphatase Cancer Cell 2010 18 6 641 54 21156286
  51. [53]Kutuk O Temel SG Tolunay S Basaga H Aven blocks DNA damage-induced apoptosis by stabilising Bcl-xL Eur J Cancer 2010 46 13 2494 505 20619636
  52. [54]Hayashi MT Karlseder J DNA damage associated with mitosis and cytokinesis failure Oncogene 2013 32 39 4593 601 23318447 PMC3681845
  53. [55]Lanni Jennifer S Jacks Tyler Characterization of the p53-Dependent Postmitotic Checkpoint following Spindle Disruption Mol Cell Biol 1998 18 2 1055 64 9448003 PMC108818
  54. [56]Quignon F Rozier L Lachages AM Bieth A Simili M Debatisse M Sustained mitotic block elicits DNA breaks: one-step alteration of ploidy and chromosome integrity in mammalian cells Oncogene 2007 26 2 165 72 16832348
  55. [57]Orth JD Loewer A Lahav G Mitchison TJ Prolonged mitotic arrest triggers partial activation of apoptosis, resulting in DNA damage and p53 induction Mol Biol Cell 2012 23 4 567 76 22171325 PMC3279386
  56. [58]Lai SK Wong CH Lee YP Li HY Caspase-3-mediated degradation of condensin Cap-H regulates mitotic cell death Cell Death Differ 2011 18 996 1004 21151026 PMC3131938
  57. [59]Hain KO Colin DJ Rastogi S Allan LA Clarke PR Prolonged mitotic arrest induces a caspase-dependent DNA damage response at telomeres that determines cell survival Sci Rep 2016 6 26766 27230693 PMC4882748
  58. [60]Crasta K Ganem NJ Dagher R Lantermann AB Ivanova EV Pan Y Nezi L Protopopov A Chowdhury D Pellman D DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis Nature 2012 482 53 8 22258507 PMC3271137
  59. [61]Uetake Y Sluder G Prolonged prometaphase blocks daughter cell proliferation despite normal completion of mitosis Curr Biol 2010 20 18 1666 71 20832310 PMC2946429
  60. [62]Fong CS Mazo G Das T Goodman J Kim M O’Rourke BP Izquierdo D Tsou MF 53BP1 and USP28 mediate p53-dependent cell cycle arrest in response to centrosome loss and prolonged mitosis Elife 2016 5 pii e16270 PMC4946878 27371829
  61. [63]Lambrus BG Daggubati V Uetake Y Scott PM Clutario KM Sluder G Holland AJ A USP28-53BP1-p53-p21 signaling axis arrests growth after centrosome loss or prolonged mitosis J Cell Biol 2016 214 2 143 53 27432896 PMC4949452
  62. [64]Meitinger F Anzola JV Kaulich M Richardson A Stender JD Benner C Glass CK Dowdy SF Desai A Shiau AK Oegema K 53BP1 and USP28 mediate p53 activation and G1 arrest after centrosome loss or extended mitotic duration J Cell Biol 2016 214 2 155 66 27432897 PMC4949453
  63. [65]Mason KA Hunter NR Milas M Abbruzzese JL Milas L Docetaxel enhances tumor radioresponse in vivo Clin Cancer Res 1997 3 2431 8 9815644
  64. [66]Schimming R Mason KA Hunter N Weil M Kishi K Milas L Lack of correlation between mitotic arrest or apoptosis and antitumor effect of docetaxel Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999 43 2 165 72 9923824
  65. [67]Del Gaizo Moore V Letai A BH3 profiling–measuring integrated function of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway to predict cell fate decisions Cancer Lett 2013 332 2 202 5 22230093 PMC3770266
  66. [68]Ni Chonghaile T Sarosiek KA Vo TT Ryan JA Tammareddi A Moore Vdel G Deng J Anderson KC Richardson P Tai YT Mitsiades CS Matulonis UA Drapkin R Stone R Deangelo DJ McConkey DJ Sallan SE Silverman L Hirsch MS Carrasco DR Letai A Pretreatment mitochondrial priming correlates with clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy Science 2011 334 6059 1129 33 22033517 PMC3280949
  67. [69]Mason K Staab A Hunter N McBride W Petersen S Terry N Milas L 2001 Enhancement of tumor radioresponse by docetaxel: Involvement of immune system Int J Oncol 18 599 606 11179493
  68. [70]Demaria S Volm MD Shapiro RL Yee HT Oratz R Formenti SC Muggia F Symmans WF Development of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer after neoadjuvant paclitaxel chemotherapy Clin Cancer Res 2001 7 10 3025 30 11595690
  69. [71]Little JB Cellular radiation effects and the bystander response Mutat Res 2006 597 1–2 113 8 16413041
  70. [72]Alexandre J Hu Y Lu W Pelicano H Huang P Novel action of paclitaxel against cancer cells: bystander effect mediated by reactive oxygen species Cancer Res 2007 67 8 3512 7 17440056
  71. [73]Orth JD Kohler RH Foijer F Sorger PK Weissleder R Mitchison TJ Analysis of mitosis and antimitotic drug responses in tumors by in vivo microscopy and single-cell pharmacodynamics Cancer Res 2011 71 13 4608 16 21712408 PMC3129392
  72. [74]Symmans WF Volm MD Shapiro RL Perkins AB Kim AY Demaria S Yee HT McMullen H Oratz R Klein P Formenti SC Muggia F Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis and mitotic arrest assessed by serial fine-needle aspiration: implications for early prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment Clin Cancer Res 2000 6 12 4610 7 11156210
  73. [75]Perez-Soler R Kemp B Wu QP Mao L Gomez J Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A Yee H Lee JS Jagirdar J Ling YH Response and determinants of sensitivity to paclitaxel in human non-small cell lung cancer tumors heterotransplanted in nude mice Clin Cancer Res 2000 6 12 4932 8 11156254
  74. [76]Mitchison TJ The proliferation rate paradox in antimitotic chemotherapy Mol Biol Cell 2012 23 1 1 6 22210845 PMC3248889
  75. [77]Nihei Y Suzuki M Okano A Tsuji T Akiyama Y Tsuruo T Saito S Hori K Sato Y Evaluation of antivascular and antimitotic effects of tubulin binding agents in solid tumor therapy Jpn J Cancer Res 1999 90 12 1387 95 10665658 PMC5926039
  76. [78]Hotchkiss KA Ashton AW Mahmood R Russell RG Sparano JA Schwartz EL Inhibition of endothelial cell function in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo by docetaxel (Taxotere): association with impaired repositioning of the microtubule organizing center Mol Cancer Ther 2002 1 13 1191 200 12479700
  77. [80]Vlahovic G Karantza V Wang D Cosgrove D Rudersdorf N Yang J Xiong H Busman T Mabry M A phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of ABT-263 in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with solid tumors Invest New Drugs 2014 32 5 976 84 24894650
  78. [81]Zhang H Nimmer PM Tahir SK Chen J Fryer RM Hahn KR Iciek LA Morgan SJ Nasarre MC Nelson R Preusser LC Reinhart GA Smith ML Rosenberg SH Elmore SW Tse C Bcl-2 family proteins are essential for platelet survival Cell Death Differ 2007 14 5 943 51 17205078
  79. [82]Khalil DN Smith EL Brentjens RJ Wolchok JD The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016 13 5 273 90 26977780 PMC5551685
  80. [83]Shin DS Ribas A The evolution of checkpoint blockade as a cancer therapy: what’s here, what’s next? Curr Opin Immunol 2015 33 23 35 25621841
  81. [84]Melero I Gaudernack G Gerritsen W Huber C Parmiani G Scholl S Thatcher N Wagstaff J Zielinski C Faulkner I Mellstedt H Therapeutic vaccines for cancer: an overview of clinical trials Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014 11 9 509 24 25001465
  82. [85]Hodge JW Ardiani A Farsaci B Kwilas AR Gameiro SR The tipping point for combination therapy: cancer vaccines with radiation, chemotherapy, or targeted small molecule inhibitors Semin Oncol 2012 39 3 323 39 22595055 PMC3356994
  83. [86]Lynch TJ Bondarenko I Luft A Serwatowski P Barlesi F Chacko R Sebastian M Neal J Lu H Cuillerot JM Reck M Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II study J Clin Oncol 2012 30 17 2046 54 22547592
  84. [87]Reck M Bondarenko I Luft A Serwatowski P Barlesi F Chacko R Sebastian M Lu H Cuillerot JM Lynch TJ Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy in extensive-disease-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial Ann Oncol 2013 24 1 75 83 22858559
  85. [88]Slovin S Chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination in advanced prostate cancer Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2012 10 2 90 100 22402350
  86. [89]Antonia SJ Larkin J Ascierto PA Immuno-oncology combinations: a review of clinical experience and future prospects Clin Cancer Res 2014 20 24 6258 68 25341541
  87. [90]Wang Y Lee YM Baitsch L Huang A Xiang Y Tong H Lako A Von T Choi C Lim E Min J Li L Stegmeier F Schlegel R Eck MJ Gray NS Mitchison TJ Zhao JJ MELK is an oncogenic kinase essential for mitotic progression in basal-like breast cancer cells Elife 2014 3 e01763 24844244 PMC4059381
  88. [91]Wang Y Begley M Li Q Huang HT Lako A Eck MJ Gray NS Mitchison TJ Cantley LC Zhao JJ Mitotic MELK-eIF4B signaling controls protein synthesis and tumor cell survival Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016 113 35 9810 5 27528663 PMC5024598

Authors
Shi, J., & Mitchison, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Shi, Jue
Venue
Endocrine-Related Cancer
Published
2017-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
T83-T96
ISSN
  • 1351-0088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6821
OpenAlex
W2592682092
Cited by
79
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Related Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HKBU Institutional Repository (Hong Kong Baptist University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA139980, P01CA078048, P01CA139980, CA078048)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
antimitotic agents, cell death, microtubule inhibitors, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, Eg5, Aurora kinases, Polo-like kinase, patient stratification, combination therapy, therapeutic index, mouse tumor model
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Damage, Humans, Microtubules, Spindle Apparatus, Neoplasms, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cell Death, Antimitotic Agents, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review