Effect of enucleation of the corpus luteum at different stages of the luteal phase of the human menstrual cycle on subsequent follicular development
Open accessAbstract
Summary.: To investigate the mechanism of suppression of follicular development during the luteal phase of the human menstrual cycle, the corpus luteum was enucleated surgically from 10 women at various times after ovulation. In the 24 h after CL enucleation there was an immediate and rapid fall in the concentration of oestradiol and progesterone and a temporary decline in the concentration of FSH and LH. Within 3 days, however, all 10 women showed evidence of renewed follicular activity as indicated by a progressive rise in the concentration of oestradiol. This rise was preceded by a rise in the concentration of FSH and LH, and ovulation, as indicated by a mid-cycle surge in LH and rise in the concentration of plasma progesterone, occurred 16–19 days after enucleation. There was no significant difference in the time to ovulation following enucleation at different times of the luteal phase. The post-operative follicular phase, measured from the time of enucleation, was 3 days longer than that observed pre-operatively from the first day of menstrual bleeding. In the follicular phase of post-operative cycles the concentration of FSH was higher and that of oestradiol lower than the corresponding values before surgery. These results indicate that the absence of healthy antral follicles in the luteal phase of the cycle is due to the inhibitory effects of the corpus luteum. The fact that, after CL enucleation, emergence of the dominant follicle was always preceded by a rise in the concentration of FSH and LH suggests that suppression of gonadotrophins by ovarian steroids secreted by the corpus luteum is responsible for the inhibition of follicular development during the luteal phase of the cycle.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Follicle growth is stimulated by FSH and inhibited by P4.
“Follicle growth is stimulated by FSH and inhibted by P4 (Baird et al., 1984).”
From Hormonal regulation of ovarian follicle growth in humans: Model-based exploration of cycle variability and parameter sensitivities (2022) · cites this paper as Baird et al., 1984
The Introduction says a rise in FSH (and LH) likely stimulates small-antral-follicle development and suggests progesterone plays a key role in inhibiting follicular development. The Abstract attributes luteal-phase inhibition more cautiously to ovarian steroids suppressing gonadotrophins. The claim presents FSH stimulation and P4 inhibition as unqualified facts, whereas the paper hedges those roles and does not isolate P4 as the sole inhibitor. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [2]2. Baird, D.T. (1977) Content and secretion of steroids by the human ovary in vivo. In Endocrinology, Vol. I, pp. 330-336.
- [18]18. Gougeon, A. (1982) Rate of follicular growth in the human ovary. In Follicular Maturation and Ovulation, pp. 155-163.
- [20]20. Hodgen, G.D. (1982) Selection and ovulation of the dominant follicle : role of intra-ovarian progesterone. In Hormonal Factors in Fertility, Infertility and Contraception, pp. 28-44.
- [33]33. Scaramuzza R.J., Corker, C.S., Young, G. & Baird, D.T. (1975) Production of antisera to steroid hormones in sheep. In Steroid Immunoassay, pp. 111-122.
- [36]36. Siegel, S. (1956) Non-Parametric Statistics. McGraw Hill, New York.
- [42]42. Yen, S.S.C., Vandenberg, G., Tsai, C.C. & Parker, D.C (1974) Ultradian fluctuations of gonadotropins. In Biorhythms and Human Reproduction, pp. 203-218.
- [43]43. Eds M. Ferin, F. Halberg, R. M. Richart & R. L. Van de Wiele. John Wiley, New York. Received 5 August 1983
- Authors
- Baird, D. T., Bäckström, T., McNeilly, A. S., Smith, S. K., & Wathen, C. G.
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-03-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 615-624
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W1996598793
- Semantic Scholar
- 6bdbeb9e1348f820c6771bc7c1d2ba76e5d95815
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Keywords
- luteal phase, folliculogenesis, menstrual cycle, estradiol, progesterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, ovulation, gonadotropin suppression, ovarian steroids, dominant follicle, antral follicles
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Corpus Luteum, Estradiol, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Luteal Phase, Menstruation, Progesterone, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review