The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhanced fetal growth in sheep administered progesterone during the first three days of pregnancy
Open accessAbstract
Two experiments were conducted to determine whether administration of progesterone during early pregnancy affects fetal growth in sheep and if any effect is specific to the days of treatment. In the first experiment, Merino ewes were randomly allocated to four treatment groups and inseminated at a synchronized oestrus. Three groups received progesterone on days 1–3, 3–6 or 1–6 of pregnancy while the fourth group was untreated. Concentrations of progesterone in peripheral plasma increased (P < 0.05) in all treatment groups. Fetal growth (to day 74) was greater in all treatment groups than in the control group (P< 0.001) and was greatest when treatments started on day 1. Pregnancy rate was not affected by progesterone treatment on days 3–6, but was reduced (P < 0.05) when treatment began on day 1. In the second experiment, embryos that had been exposed to either a normal (control) or a high concentration of progesterone on days 1–3 were randomly transferred, within groups, to recipient ewes that had or had not been treated with progesterone on days 1–3. In another group, embryos were exposed to a high concentration of progesterone on days 1–3 and the oviducts of the ewe were ligated. An increase in fetal mass was observed in the recipient group that had been treated with progesterone (P < 0.01) but was not observed in the initial group treated with progesterone. A greater fetal mass was also obtained when embryos that had been ligated in the oviducts of ewes treated with progesterone (P < 0.05) were transferred. This effect occurred irrespective of whether the final recipients received progesterone. These findings indicate that progesterone supplementation to ewes during the first 3 days of pregnancy enhances the growth of surviving fetuses. It is concluded that progesterone treatment or ligation of the oviducts during the first three days of pregnancy induce changes in embryo development that affect subsequent development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thompson, J. G., Gardner, D. K., Anne Pugh, P., McMillan, W. H., & Robin Tervit, H. (1995) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1385 · Cited by 441
JARCHO, M. R., MENDOZA, S. P., & BALES, K. L. (2012) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22003 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleemann, D. O., Walker, S. K., & Seamark, R. F.
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 411-417
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W1977331240
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced fetal growth in sheep administered progesterone during the first three days of pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/jrf.0.1020411
- The paper
- Kleemann, D. O., Walker, S. K., & Seamark, R. F. (1994). Enhanced fetal growth in sheep administered progesterone during the first three days of pregnancy. Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1020411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.