The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spermatogonial stem cells in higher primates: are there differences from those in rodents?
Open accessAbstract
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) maintain spermatogenesis throughout the reproductive life of mammals. While Asingle spermatogonia comprise the rodent SSC pool, the identity of the stem cell pool in the primate spermatogenic lineage is not well established. The prevailing model is that primate spermatogenesis arises from Adark and Apale spermatogonia, which are considered to represent reserve and active stem cells respectively. However, there is limited information about how the Adark and Apale descriptions of nuclear morphology correlate with the clonal (Asingle, Apaired, and Aaligned), molecular (e.g. GFRα1 (GFRA1) and PLZF), and functional (SSC transplantation) descriptions of rodent SSCs. Thus, there is a need to investigate primate SSCs using criteria, tools, and approaches that have been used to investigate rodent SSCs over the past two decades. SSCs have potential clinical application for treating some cases of male infertility, providing impetus for characterizing and learning to manipulate these adult tissue stem cells in primates (nonhuman and human). This review recounts the development of a xenotransplant assay for functional identification of primate SSCs and progress dissecting the molecular and clonal characteristics of the primate spermatogenic lineage. These observations highlight the similarities and potential differences between rodents and primates regarding the SSC pool and the kinetics of spermatogonial self-renewal and clonal expansion. With new tools and reagents for studying primate spermatogonia, the field is poised to develop and test new hypotheses about the biology and regenerative capacity of primate SSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Germline Stem Cell Niche Unit in Mammalian Testes
Oatley, J. M., & Brinster, R. L. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2011 · Cited by 513
Determinants of Mutation Rate Variation in the Human Germline
Ségurel, L., Wyman, M. J., & Przeworski, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-031714-125740 · Cited by 289
Mutation rates and the evolution of germline structure
Scally, A. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0137 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Hermann, B. P., Sukhwani, M., Hansel, M. C., & Orwig, K. E.
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 479-493
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W2008427166
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spermatogonial stem cells in higher primates: are there differences from those in rodents? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/rep-09-0255
- The paper
- Hermann, B. P., Sukhwani, M., Hansel, M. C., & Orwig, K. E. (2010). Spermatogonial stem cells in higher primates: are there differences from those in rodents? Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-09-0255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.