miR-23b-3p regulates human endometrial epithelial cell adhesion implying a role in implantation
Abstract
In brief miR-23b-3p expression is increased in fertile endometrium during receptivity. This study investigates the function of miR-23b-3p on endometrial adhesion and its downstream targets. Abstract The human endometrium undergoes dramatic remodeling throughout the menstrual cycle that is essential for successful blastocyst attachment and implantation in the mid-secretory (receptive) phase. microRNA (miR) plays a role in the preparation of endometrial receptivity. miR-23b-3p expression is increased in fertile endometrium during receptivity. Here, we aimed to investigate miR-23b-3p function during receptivity. qPCR and in situ hybridization were used to investigate the expression and localization of miR-23b-3p in human endometrium, respectively. Ishikawa cells (endometrial epithelial cell line) and endometrial organoid-derived epithelial cells were transfected with miR-23b-3p mimic, and trophoblast progenitor spheroid (blastocyst surrogate) adhesion assay was used to determine effects on blastocyst adhesion to endometrial cells. We demonstrated that miR-23b-3p was significantly upregulated in the fertile endometrium of the receptive phase compared to the non-receptive, proliferative phase. No difference was identified for the expression of miR-23b-3p between fertile and infertile mid-secretory phase endometrium. miR-23b-3p localized to the epithelium and stroma in the mid-secretory phase but was undetectable in the proliferative phase of fertile endometrium. Functionally, miR-…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
miR-23 may be a key regulator factor in endometrial epithelial adhesion and receptivity.
“These results indicate that miR-23 may be a key regulator factor in endometrial epithelial adhesion and receptivity [4,125].”
From Recent advances of miR-23 in human diseases and growth development (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Immunoprecipitation experiment confirmed that CUL3 can directly interact with β-catenin.
“the immunoprecipitation experiment confirmed that CUL3 can directly interact with β-catenin.”
From Recent advances of miR-23 in human diseases and growth development (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Overexpression of miR-23-3p is advantageous to endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation, enhancing the adhesion ability of trophoblast spheroids for normal conception.
“overexpression of miR-23–3p is advantageous to endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation, enhancing the adhesion ability of trophoblast spheroids for normal conception.”
From Recent advances of miR-23 in human diseases and growth development (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Expression of miR-23-3p is upregulated in endometrial epithelial cells of pregnant mice, and its expression level is positively correlated with pregnancy time.
“The expression of miR-23–3p is upregulated in endometrial epithelial cells of pregnant mice, and its expression level is positively correlated with pregnancy time.”
From Recent advances of miR-23 in human diseases and growth development (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
miR-23a-3p can suppress ubiquitination and degradation of β-catenin by targeting CUL3.
“miR-23a-3p can suppress the ubiquitination and degradation of β-catenin by targeting CUL3”
From Recent advances of miR-23 in human diseases and growth development (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., et al. (2017) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dex234 · Cited by 1,320 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent advances of miR-23 in human diseases and growth development
Qian, X., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, N., Xu, B., Pei, K., Yu, Z., & Wu, W. (2025) · Non-coding RNA Research · doi:10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.12.010 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barton, S., Zhou, W., Santos, L. L., Menkhorst, E., Yang, G., Tinn Teh, W., Ang, C., Lucky, T., & Dimitriadis, E.
- Affiliations
- Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Venue
- Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-03-08
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-416
- ISSN
- 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-7899
- OpenAlex
- W4319656300
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- miR-23b-3p, endometrial receptivity, embryo implantation, secretory phase endometrium, MET, SFRP4, miRNA target genes, endometrial organoids, Ishikawa cells
- MeSH terms
- Cell Adhesion, Endometrium, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Embryo Implantation, MicroRNAs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review