Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Chicken Genome Assembly Provides Insight into Avian Genome Structure

Open access
Warren, Wesley C, Hillier, LaDeana W, Tomlinson, Chad, Minx, Patrick, Kremitzki, Milinn, Graves, Tina, Markovic, Chris, Bouk, Nathan, Pruitt, Kim D, Thibaud-Nissen, Francoise, Schneider, Valerie, Mansour, Tamer A, Brown, C Titus, Zimin, Aleksey, Hawken, Rachel, Abrahamsen, Mitch, Pyrkosz, Alexis B, Morisson, Mireille, Fillon, Valerie, Vignal, Alain, Chow, William, Howe, Kerstin, Fulton, Janet E, Miller, Marcia M, Lovell, Peter, Mello, Claudio V, Wirthlin, Morgan, Mason, Andrew S, Kuo, Richard, Burt, David W, Dodgson, Jerry B, Cheng, Hans H·2017·G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics

Abstract

The importance of the Gallus gallus (chicken) as a model organism and agricultural animal merits a continuation of sequence assembly improvement efforts. We present a new version of the chicken genome assembly (Gallus_gallus-5.0; GCA_000002315.3), built from combined long single molecule sequencing technology, finished BACs, and improved physical maps. In overall assembled bases, we see a gain of 183 Mb, including 16.4 Mb in placed chromosomes with a corresponding gain in the percentage of intact repeat elements characterized. Of the 1.21 Gb genome, we include three previously missing autosomes, GGA30, 31, and 33, and improve sequence contig length 10-fold over the previous Gallus_gallus-4.0. Despite the significant base representation improvements made, 138 Mb of sequence is not yet located to chromosomes. When annotated for gene content, Gallus_gallus-5.0 shows an increase of 4679 annotated genes (2768 noncoding and 1911 protein-coding) over those in Gallus_gallus-4.0. We also revisited the question of what genes are missing in the avian lineage, as assessed by the highest quality avian genome assembly to date, and found that a large fraction of the original set of missing genes are still absent in sequenced bird species. Finally, our new data support a detailed map of MHC-B, encompassing two segments: one with a highly stable gene copy number and another in which the gene copy number is highly variable. The chicken model has been a critical resource for many other fields of study, and this new reference assembly will substantially further these efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/g3.116.035923

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Warren, W. C., Hillier, L. W., Tomlinson, C., Minx, P., Kremitzki, M., Graves, T., Markovic, C., Bouk, N., Pruitt, K. D., Thibaud-Nissen, F., Schneider, V., Mansour, T. A., Brown, C. T., Zimin, A., Hawken, R., Abrahamsen, M., Pyrkosz, A. B., Morisson, M., Fillon, V., Vignal, A., Chow, W., Howe, K., Fulton, J. E., Miller, M. M., Lovell, P., Mello, C. V., Wirthlin, M., Mason, A. S., Kuo, R., Burt, D. W., Dodgson, J. B., & Cheng, H. H.
Venue
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
109-117
ISSN
2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2552622217
Cited by
283
References
5
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.