Cited by 100Fungal Infections and StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

A Population Genomics Approach to Assessing the Genetic Basis of Within-Host Microevolution Underlying Recurrent Cryptococcal Meningitis Infection

Open access
Rhodes, Johanna, Beale, Mathew A, Vanhove, Mathieu, Jarvis, Joseph N, Kannambath, Shichina, Simpson, John A, Ryan, Anthea, Meintjes, Graeme +3 more·2017·G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recurrence of meningitis due to Cryptococcus neoformans after treatment causes substantial mortality in HIV/AIDS patients across sub-Saharan Africa. In order to determine whether recurrence occurred due to relapse of the original infecting isolate or reinfection with a different isolate weeks or months after initial treatment, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to assess the genetic basis of infection in 17 HIV-infected individuals with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Comparisons revealed a clonal relationship for 15 pairs of isolates recovered before and after recurrence showing relapse of the original infection. The two remaining pairs showed high levels of genetic heterogeneity; in one pair we found this to be a result of infection by mixed genotypes, while the second was a result of nonsense mutations in the gene encoding the DNA mismatch repair proteins MSH2, MSH5, and RAD5. These nonsense mutations led to a hypermutator state, leading to dramatically elevated rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. Hypermutator phenotypes owing to nonsense mutations in these genes have not previously been reported in C. neoformans, and represent a novel pathway for rapid within-host adaptation and evolution of resistance to first-line antifungal drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/g3.116.037499

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 100

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Burns J. L. Gibson R. L. McNamara S. Yim D. Emerson J., 2001 Longitudinal assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in young children with cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. Dis. 183(3): 444– 452. 11133376
  2. Meyer W. Aanensen D. M. Boekhout T. Cogliati M. Diaz M. R., 2009 Consensus multi-locus sequence typing scheme for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. Med. Mycol. 47(6): 561– 570. 19462334 PMC2884100

Authors
Rhodes, J., Beale, M. A., Vanhove, M., Jarvis, J. N., Kannambath, S., Simpson, J. A., Ryan, A., Meintjes, G., Harrison, T. S., Fisher, M. C., & Bicanic, T.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Fisher, Matthew C
  • Bicanic, Tihana
Venue
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
Published
2017-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
1165-1176
ISSN
2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586809048
Cited by
100
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania (P30 AI 045008)
  • Wellcome Trust (/WT081794)
  • Imperial College London
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington (P30-AI-045008)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K000373/1, K000373/1)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI045008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans, relapse versus reinfection, clonal relatedness, mixed genotypes, DNA mismatch repair, MSH2, MSH5, Rad5, nonsense mutation, hypermutator phenotype, antifungal resistance, HIV/AIDS, synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aneuploidy, Cryptococcus neoformans, Demography, Biological Evolution, Female, Genetics, Population, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Phylogeny, Recurrence, Genetic Variation, Chromosomes, Fungal, Meningitis, Cryptococcal, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Codon, Nonsense, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, DNA Mismatch Repair, Host-Pathogen Interactions, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review