Cited by 67Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Inbred or Outbred? Genetic Diversity in Laboratory Rodent Colonies

Open access
Brekke, Thomas D, Steele, Katherine A, Mulley, John F·2018·G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Nonmodel rodents are widely used as subjects for both basic and applied biological research, but the genetic diversity of the study individuals is rarely quantified. University-housed colonies tend to be small and subject to founder effects and genetic drift; so they may be highly inbred or show substantial genetic divergence from other colonies, even those derived from the same source. Disregard for the levels of genetic diversity in an animal colony may result in a failure to replicate results if a different colony is used to repeat an experiment, as different colonies may have fixed alternative variants. Here we use high throughput sequencing to demonstrate genetic divergence in three isolated colonies of Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) even though they were all established recently from the same source. We also show that genetic diversity in allegedly “outbred” colonies of nonmodel rodents (gerbils, hamsters, house mice, deer mice, and rats) varies considerably from nearly no segregating diversity to very high levels of polymorphism. We conclude that genetic divergence in isolated colonies may play an important role in the “replication crisis.” In a more positive light, divergent rodent colonies represent an opportunity to leverage genetically distinct individuals in genetic crossing experiments. In sum, awareness of the genetic diversity of an animal colony is paramount as it allows researchers to properly replicate experiments and also to capitalize on other genetically distinct individuals to explore the genetic basis of a trait.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/g3.117.300495

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rat strains are more commonly used as outbred stocks, so more genetic variability can be expected.

    “While the natural genetics of mice and rats follow the same principles, practically, it is important to note that rat stains are more commonly used as outbred stocks where more genetic variability can be expected (Brekke et al., 2018; Wildt et al., 2008).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Brekke et al., 2018

    The Abstract (page unavailable) explains that outbred colonies can have standing genetic variation, but also cautions that an “outbred” label may have little bearing on the diversity actually present. The paper does not say that rat stocks are more commonly outbred than mouse stocks; Results Table 2 (page unavailable) instead includes data from 96 inbred rat strains. Thus the general point about potential variability is supported, but the rat-specific comparison and expectation are not. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Abbas L. Rivolta M. N., 2015 Aminoglycoside ototoxicity and hair cell ablation in the adult gerbil: a simple model to study hair cell loss and regeneration. Hear. Res. 325: 12– 26. 25783988 PMC4441107
  2. Balloux F. Amos W. Coulson T., 2004 Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol. Ecol. 13: 3021– 3031. 15367117
  3. Brekke T. D. Good J. M., 2014 Parent-of-origin growth effects and the evolution of hybrid inviability in dwarf hamsters. Evolution 68: 3134– 3148. 25130206 PMC4437546
  4. Brekke T. D. Henry L. A. Good J. M., 2016 Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation. Evolution 70: 2690– 2703. 27714796 PMC5123974
  5. Buchhalter J. R., 1993 Animal models of inherited epilepsy. Epilepsia 34: S31– S41. 8500431
  6. Buckmaster P. S., 2006 Inherited epilepsy in Mongolian gerbils, pp. 273– 294 in Models of Seizures and Epilepsy, edited by Pitkänen A. Schwartzkroin P. A. Moshé S. L. Academic Press, Burlington, ON.
  7. Casellas J., 2011 Inbred mouse strains and genetic stability: a review. Animal 5: 1– 7. 22440695
  8. Catchen J. Hohenlohe P. A. Bassham S. Amores A. Cresko W. A., 2013 Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22: 3124– 3140. 23701397 PMC3936987
  9. Catchen J. M. Amores A. Hohenlohe P. Cresko W. Postlethwait J. H., 2011 Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3 (Bethesda) 1: 171– 182. 22384329 PMC3276136
  10. Chen W. Jongkamonwiwat N. Abbas L. Eshtan S. J. Johnson S. L., 2012 Restoration of auditory evoked responses by human ES-cell-derived otic progenitors. Nature 490: 278– 282. 22972191 PMC3480718
  11. Chia R. Achilli F. Festing M. F. W. Fisher E. M. C., 2005 The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks. Nat. Genet. 37: 1181– 1186. 16254564
  12. Churchill G. A. Airey D. C. Allayee H. Angel J. M. Attie A. D., 2004 The collaborative cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat. Genet. 36: 1133– 1137. 15514660
  13. Clark M. M. Ham M. Galef B. G., 1994 Differences in the sex ratios of offspring originating in the right and left ovaries of Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 101: 393– 396. 7932374
  14. Collaborative Cross Consortium, 2012 The genome architecture of the collaborative cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics 190: 389– 401. 22345608 PMC3276630
  15. de Koning D.-J. McIntyre L. M., 2017 Back to the future: multiparent populations provide the key to unlocking the genetic basis of complex traits. Genetics 206: 527– 529. 28592493 PMC5494722
  16. Du X. Chen Z. Li W. Tan Y. Lu J., 2010 Development of novel microsatellite DNA markers by cross-amplification and analysis of genetic variation in gerbils. J. Hered. 101: 710– 716. 20525768
  17. Du X. Y. Li W. Sa X. Y. Li C. L. Lu J., 2015 Selection of an effective microsatellite marker system for genetic control and analysis of gerbil populations in China. Genet. Mol. Res. 14: 11030– 11042. 26400333
  18. Elshire R. J. Glaubitz J. C. Sun Q. Poland J. A. Kawamoto K., 2011 A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6: e19379. 21573248 PMC3087801
  19. Eppig J. T., 2007 Mouse strain and genetic nomenclature: an abbreviated guide, pp. 79– 98 in The Mouse in Biomedical Research, edited by Fox J. G. Davisson M. T. Quimby F. W. Barthold S. W. Newcomer C. E. et al Elsevier, London.
  20. Falush D. Stephens M. Pritchard J. K., 2003 Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567– 1587. 12930761 PMC1462648
  21. Falush D. Stephens M. Pritchard J. K., 2007 Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 574– 578. 18784791 PMC1974779
  22. Festing M. F., 1999 Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research. Neurobiol. Aging 20: 237– 244. 10537033
  23. Festing M. F. W., 2010 Inbred strains should replace outbred stocks in toxicology, safety testing, and drug development. Toxicol. Pathol. 38: 681– 690. 20562325
  24. Fuchsberger C. Flannick J. Teslovich T. M. Mahajan A. Agarwala V., 2016 The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. Nature 536: 1– 29. PMC5034897 27398621
  25. Gawriluk T. R. Simkin J. Thompson K. L. Biswas S. K. Clare-Salzler Z., 2016 Comparative analysis of ear-hole closure identifies epimorphic regeneration as a discrete trait in mammals. Nat. Commun. 7: 1– 16. PMC4848467 27109826
  26. Groen A. Lagerwerf A. J., 1979 Genic heterogeneity and genetic monitoring of mouse outbred stocks. Lab. Anim. 13: 81– 85. 480905
  27. Harper J. M., 2008 Wild-derived mouse stocks: an underappreciated tool for aging research. Age (Dordr.) 30: 135– 145. 19424863 PMC2527627
  28. Li H. Durbin R., 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754– 1760. 19451168 PMC2705234
  29. Li H. Handsaker B. Wysoker A. Fennell T. Ruan J., 2009 The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078– 2079. 19505943 PMC2723002
  30. Li X. Lu J. Wang Y. Huo X. Li Z., 2016 Establishment and characterization of a newly established diabetic gerbil line. PLoS One 11: e0159420. 27427908 PMC4948894
  31. Little T. J. Colegrave N., 2016 Caging and uncaging genetics. PLoS Biol. 14: e1002525. 27458971 PMC4961361
  32. Love J. M. Knight A. M. McAleer M. A. Todd J. A., 1990 Towards construction of a high resolution map of the mouse genome using PCR-analysed microsatellites. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 4123– 4130. 2377456 PMC331168
  33. McManus J. J., 1972 Water relations and food consumption of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A. Physiol. 43: 959– 967. 4405352
  34. Meisler M. H. Kearney J. Ottman R. Escayg A., 2001 Identification of epilepsy genes in human and mouse. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35: 567– 588. 11700294 PMC2765248
  35. Ness R. W. Zhang Y.-H. Cong L. Wang Y. Zhang J.-X., 2012 Nuclear gene variation in wild brown rats. G3 (Bethesda) 2: 1661– 1664. 23275888 PMC3516487
  36. Neumann K. Maak S. Stuermer I. W. von Lengerken G. Gattermann R., 2001 Low microsatellite variation in laboratory gerbrils. J. Hered. 92: 71– 74. 11336232
  37. Papaioannou V. E. Festing M. F., 1980 Genetic drift in a stock of laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 14: 11– 13. 6928500
  38. Petrij F. van Veen K. Mettler M. Brückmann V., 2001 A second acromelanistic allelomorph at the albino locus of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). J. Hered. 92: 74– 78. 11336233
  39. Pritchard J. K. Stephens M. Donnelly P., 2000 Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945– 959. 10835412 PMC1461096
  40. Razzoli M., 2003 AFLP to assess genetic variation in laboratory gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J. Hered. 94: 507– 511. 14691317
  41. Rich S. S., 2016 Diabetes: still a geneticist’s nightmare. Nature 536: 37– 38. 27398618
  42. Richter S. H. Garner J. P. Zipser B. Lewejohann L. Sachser N., 2011 Effect of population heterogenization on the reproducibility of mouse behavior: a multi-laboratory study. PLoS One. 6: e16461. 21305027 PMC3031565
  43. Roberts A. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F. Wang W. McMillan L. Threadgill D. W., 2007 The polymorphism architecture of mouse genetic resources elucidated using genome-wide resequencing data: implications for QTL discovery and systems genetics. Mamm. Genome 18: 473– 481. 17674098 PMC1998888
  44. Rosenberg N. A. Pritchard J. K. Weber J. L. Cann H. M. Kidd K. K., 2002 Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298: 2381– 2385. 12493913
  45. Salcedo T. Geraldes A. Nachman M. W., 2007 Nucleotide variation in wild and inbred mice. Genetics 177: 2277– 2291. 18073432 PMC2219490
  46. Santure A. W. Stapley J. Ball A. D. Birkhead T. R. Burke T., 2010 On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Mol. Ecol. 19: 1439– 1451. 20149098
  47. Serikawa T. Kuramoto T. Hilbert P. Mori M. Yamada J., 1992 Rat gene mapping using PCR-analyzed microsatellites. Genetics 131: 701– 721. 1628813 PMC1205041
  48. Sittig L. J. Carbonetto P. Engel K. A. Krauss K. S. Barrios-Camacho C. M., 2016 Genetic background limits generalizability of genotype-phenotype relationships. Neuron 91: 1253– 1259. 27618673 PMC5033712
  49. Smits B. M. G. van Zutphen B. F. M. Plasterk R. H. A. Cuppen E., 2004 Genetic variation in coding regions between and within commonly used inbred rat strains. Genome Res. 14: 1285– 1290. 15231744 PMC442143
  50. Srivastava A. Morgan A. P. Najarian M. L. Sarsani V. K. Sigmon J. S., 2017 Genomes of the mouse collaborative cross. Genetics 206: 537– 556. 28592495 PMC5499171
  51. Stuermer I. W. Wetzel W., 2006 Early experience and domestication affect auditory discrimination learning, open field behaviour and brain size in wild Mongolian gerbils and domesticated laboratory gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus forma domestica). Behav. Brain Res. 173: 11– 21. 16846650
  52. Svenson K. L. Gatti D. M. Valdar W. Welsh C. E. Cheng R., 2012 High-resolution genetic mapping using the Mouse Diversity outbred population. Genetics 190: 437– 447. 22345611 PMC3276626
  53. Thiessen D. D. Kittrell E. M., 1980 The Harderian gland and thermoregulation in the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Physiol. Behav. 24: 417– 424. 7378139
  54. Threadgill D. W. Churchill G. A., 2012 Ten years of the collaborative cross. Genetics 190: 291– 294. 22345604 PMC3276648
  55. Vincent A. L. Rodrick G. E., 1979 The pathology of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): a review. Lab. Anim. Sci. 29: 645– 651. 92595
  56. Weber J. N. Peterson B. K. Hoekstra H. E., 2013 Discrete genetic modules are responsible for complex burrow evolution in Peromyscus mice. Nature 493: 402– 405. 23325221
  57. Yalcin B. Nicod J. Bhomra A. Davidson S. Cleak J., 2010 Commercially available outbred mice for genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001085. 20838427 PMC2932682
  58. Zheng X. Levine D. Shen J. Gogarten S. M., 2012 A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. J. Hered. 28: 3326– 3328. PMC3519454 23060615

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling

    Wilson, R. H., & Bradfield, C. A. (2021) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.1080/03602532.2021.1955916 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

    “…in the rat aryl hydrocarbon receptor While the natural genetics of mice and rats follow the same principles, practically, it is important to note that rat stains are more commonly used as outbred stocks where more genetic variability can be expected (Wildt et al. 2008; Brekke et al. 2018).”
    Background

Authors
Brekke, T. D., Steele, K. A., & Mulley, J. F.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mulley, John F
Venue
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
679-686
ISSN
2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2745099817
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
genetic diversity, inbreeding, founder effect, genetic drift, genetic divergence, replication crisis, Mongolian gerbil, hamster, house mice, deer mouse, rats, next-generation sequencing
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Genetics, Population, Gerbillinae, Cricetinae, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Animals, Inbred Strains, Founder Effect, Animals, Outbred Strains, Genetic Drift, Mice, Rats, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review