Haploidy, diploidy and evolution of antifungal drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Open accessAbstract
We tested the hypothesis that the time course of the evolution of antifungal drug resistance depends on the ploidy of the fungus. The experiments were designed to measure the initial response to the selection imposed by the antifungal drug fluconazole up to and including the fixation of the first resistance mutation in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Under conditions of low drug concentration, mutations in the genes PDR1 and PDR3, which regulate the ABC transporters implicated in resistance to fluconazole, are favored. In this environment, diploid populations of defined size consistently became fixed for a resistance mutation sooner than haploid populations. Experiments manipulating population sizes showed that this advantage of diploids was due to increased mutation availability relative to that of haploids; in effect, diploids have twice the number of mutational targets as haploids and hence have a reduced waiting time for mutations to occur. Under conditions of high drug concentration, recessive mutations in ERG3, which result in resistance through altered sterol synthesis, are favored. In this environment, haploids consistently achieved resistance much sooner than diploids. When 29 haploid and 29 diploid populations were evolved for 100 generations in low drug concentration, the mutations fixed in diploid populations were all dominant, while the mutations fixed in haploid populations were either recessive (16 populations) or dominant (13 populations). Further, the spectrum of the 53 nonsynonymous mutations identified at the sequence level was different between haploids and diploids. These results fit existing theory on the relative abilities of haploids and diploids to adapt and suggest that the ploidy of the fungal pathogen has a strong impact on the evolution of fluconazole resistance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Due to its haploid genome, some SNP changes in C. auris may have immediate phenotypic effects.
“Due to its haploid genome, some SNP changes in C. auris may have immediate phenotypic effects [137].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
The paper’s opening discussion (page not available in our copy) says that haploids carrying beneficial mutations can respond to selection when those mutations are recessive, supporting the proposed ploidy mechanism. Its experiments concern Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however; our copy does not establish that particular SNP changes have immediate phenotypic effects in C. auris. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Anderson, J. B., Sirjusingh, C., & Ricker, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, James B
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1915-1923
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2164493870
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Keywords
- antifungal resistance, fluconazole resistance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ploidy, haploidy, diploidy, PDR1, PDR3, ABC transporters, ERG3, sterol biosynthesis, recessive mutations, dominant mutations, drug selection, resistance evolution
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Diploidy, Biological Evolution, Genetic Markers, Haploidy, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Time Factors, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review