Cited by 694Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution

He, Xionglei, Zhang, Jianzhi·2005·Genetics

Abstract

Gene duplication is the primary source of new genes. Duplicate genes that are stably preserved in genomes usually have divergent functions. The general rules governing the functional divergence, however, are not well understood and are controversial. The neofunctionalization (NF) hypothesis asserts that after duplication one daughter gene retains the ancestral function while the other acquires new functions. In contrast, the subfunctionalization (SF) hypothesis argues that duplicate genes experience degenerate mutations that reduce their joint levels and patterns of activity to that of the single ancestral gene. We here show that neither NF nor SF alone adequately explains the genome-wide patterns of yeast protein interaction and human gene expression for duplicate genes. Instead, our analysis reveals rapid SF, accompanied by prolonged and substantial NF in a large proportion of duplicate genes, suggesting a new model termed subneofunctionalization (SNF). Our results demonstrate that enormous numbers of new functions have originated via gene duplication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.104.037051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 694

Authors
He, X., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jianzhi
Venue
Genetics
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
169
Issue
2
Pages
1157-1164
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2156340505
Cited by
694
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 49
FWCI
55.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM67030, R01GM067030)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
gene duplication, subfunctionalization, neofunctionalization, functional divergence, duplicate genes, protein-protein interaction, gene expression, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, human genes
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Fungal, Humans, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Probability, Proteins, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review