The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lineage-Specific Loss of Function of Bitter Taste Receptor Genes in Humans and Nonhuman PrimatesSequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. AB198983, AB199308.
Abstract
Since the process of becoming dead genes or pseudogenes (pseudogenization) is irreversible and can occur rather rapidly under certain environmental circumstances, it is one plausible determinant for characterizing species specificity. To test this evolutionary hypothesis, we analyzed the tempo and mode of duplication and pseudogenization of bitter taste receptor (T2R) genes in humans as well as in 12 nonhuman primates. The results show that primates have accumulated more pseudogenes than mice after their separation from the common ancestor and that lineage-specific pseudogenization becomes more conspicuous in humans than in nonhuman primates. Although positive selection has operated on some amino acids in extracellular domains, functional constraints against T2R genes are more relaxed in primates than in mice and this trend has culminated in the rapid deterioration of the bitter-tasting capability in humans. Since T2R molecules play an important role in avoiding generally bitter toxic and harmful substances, substantial modification of the T2R gene repertoire is likely to reflect different responses to changes in the environment and to result from species-specific food preference during primate evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750
Goodman, M., Porter, C. A., Czelusniak, J., Page, S. L., Schneider, H., Shoshani, J., Gunnell, G., & Groves, C. P. (1998) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.1998.0495 · Cited by 743
Cited by
The receptors and cells for mammalian taste
Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M. A., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05401 · Cited by 1,621
RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework
Wertheim, J. O., Murrell, B., Smith, M. D., Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., & Scheffler, K. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu400 · Cited by 778
The life and death of gene families
Demuth, J. P., & Hahn, M. W. (2009) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.080085 · Cited by 311
Gene Losses during Human Origins
Wang, X., Grus, W. E., & Zhang, J. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040052 · Cited by 246
The Emerging Role of Polyphenols in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes
Wang, Y., Alkhalidy, H., & Liu, D. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26030703 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Go, Y., Satta, Y., Takenaka, O., & Takahata, N.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 313-326
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2099060512
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lineage-Specific Loss of Function of Bitter Taste Receptor Genes in Humans and Nonhuman PrimatesSequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. AB198983, AB199308. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.037523
- The paper
- Go, Y., Satta, Y., Takenaka, O., & Takahata, N. (2005). Lineage-Specific Loss of Function of Bitter Taste Receptor Genes in Humans and Nonhuman PrimatesSequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. AB198983, AB199308. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.037523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.