The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Birds and the Bees and the Flowers and the Trees: Lessons from Genetic Mapping of Sex Determination in Plants and Animals
Open accessAbstract
The ability to identify genetic markers in nonmodel systems has allowed geneticists to construct linkage maps for a diversity of species, and the sex-determining locus is often among the first to be mapped. Sex determination is an important area of study in developmental and evolutionary biology, as well as ecology. Its importance for organisms might suggest that sex determination is highly conserved. However, genetic studies have shown that sex determination mechanisms, and the genes involved, are surprisingly labile. We review studies using genetic mapping and phylogenetic inferences, which can help reveal evolutionary pattern within this lability and potentially identify the changes that have occurred among different sex determination systems. We define some of the terminology, particularly where confusion arises in writing about such a diverse range of organisms, and highlight some major differences between plants and animals, and some important similarities. We stress the importance of studying taxa suitable for testing hypotheses, and the need for phylogenetic studies directed to taxa where the patterns of changes can be most reliably inferred, if the ultimate goal of testing hypotheses regarding the selective forces that have led to changes in such an essential trait is to become feasible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster
Zdobnov, E. M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Torrents, D., Suyama, M., Copley, R. R., Christophides, G. K., Thomasova, D., Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077061 · Cited by 553
Cited by
Kamiya, T., Kai, W., Tasumi, S., Oka, A., Matsunaga, T., Mizuno, N., Fujita, M., Suetake, H., Suzuki, S., Hosoya, S., et al. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002798 · Cited by 606
Are all sex chromosomes created equal?
Bachtrog, D., Kirkpatrick, M., Mank, J. E., McDaniel, S. F., Pires, J. C., Rice, W., & Valenzuela, N. (2011) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.05.005 · Cited by 347
Self-citationA male-determining factor in the mosquito Aedes aegypti
Hall, A. B., Basu, S., Jiang, X., Qi, Y., Timoshevskiy, V. A., Biedler, J. K., Sharakhova, M. V., Elahi, R., Anderson, M. A. E., Chen, X.-G., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2850 · Cited by 332
Wright, A. E., Dean, R., Zimmer, F., & Mank, J. E. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12087 · Cited by 285
Self-citationNovel sex‐determining genes in fish and sex chromosome evolution
Kikuchi, K., & Hamaguchi, S. (2013) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.23927 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlesworth, D., & Mank, J. E.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-31
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2155546117
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Birds and the Bees and the Flowers and the Trees: Lessons from Genetic Mapping of Sex Determination in Plants and Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.110.117697
- The paper
- Charlesworth, D., & Mank, J. E. (2010). The Birds and the Bees and the Flowers and the Trees: Lessons from Genetic Mapping of Sex Determination in Plants and Animals. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.117697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.