Cited by 95CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringAnimal Genetics and ReproductionRNA regulation and disease

Targeted Heritable Mutation and Gene Conversion by Cas9-CRISPR in Caenorhabditis elegans

Open access
Katic, Iskra, Großhans, Helge·2013·Genetics

Abstract

We have achieved targeted heritable genome modification in Caenorhabditis elegans by injecting mRNA of the nuclease Cas9 and Cas9 guide RNAs. This system rapidly creates precise genomic changes, including knockouts and transgene-instructed gene conversion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.113.155754

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 95

Authors
Katic, I., & Großhans, H.
Affiliations
Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Katic, Iskra
  • Großhans, Helge
Venue
Genetics
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
195
Issue
3
Pages
1173-1176
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2113742465
Cited by
95
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 9
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (P40 OD010440, SNF 31003A_143313)
  • Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research
  • European Commission
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (42250, 143313)
  • National Institutes of Health (OD010440, P40OD010440)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (241985)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
Cas9, CRISPR, gene conversion, targeted mutagenesis, Caenorhabditis elegans, mRNA injection, guide RNA, transgene integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Gene Conversion, Calcium Channels, Caenorhabditis elegans, Genes, Helminth, RNA Editing, Germ-Line Mutation, Gene Targeting, RNA, Helminth, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Gene Knockout Techniques, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review