Cited by 33Fungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and Studies

A Novel Sterol-Signaling Pathway Governs Azole Antifungal Drug Resistance and Hypoxic Gene Repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Serratore, Nina D, Baker, Kortany M, Macadlo, Lauren A, Gress, Abigail R, Powers, Brendan L, Atallah, Nadia, Westerhouse, Kirsten M, Hall, Mark C +2 more·2018·Genetics

Abstract

Abstract During antifungal drug treatment and hypoxia, genetic and epigenetic changes occur to maintain sterol homeostasis and cellular function. In this study, we show that SET domain-containing epigenetic factors govern drug efficacy to the medically relevant azole class of antifungal drugs. Upon this discovery, we determined that Set4 is induced when Saccharomyces cerevisiae are treated with azole drugs or grown under hypoxic conditions; two conditions that deplete cellular ergosterol and increase sterol precursors. Interestingly, Set4 induction is controlled by the sterol-sensing transcription factors, Upc2 and Ecm22. To determine the role of Set4 on gene expression under hypoxic conditions, we performed RNA-sequencing analysis and showed that Set4 is required for global changes in gene expression. Specifically, loss of Set4 led to an upregulation of nearly all ergosterol genes, including ERG11 and ERG3, suggesting that Set4 functions in gene repression. Furthermore, mass spectrometry analysis revealed that Set4 interacts with the hypoxic-specific transcriptional repressor, Hap1, where this interaction is necessary for Set4 recruitment to ergosterol gene promoters under hypoxia. Finally, an erg3Δ strain, which produces precursor sterols but lacks ergosterol, expresses Set4 under untreated aerobic conditions. Together, our data suggest that sterol precursors are needed for Set4 induction through an Upc2-mediated mechanism. Overall, this new sterol-signaling pathway governs azole antifungal drug resistance and mediates repression of sterol genes under hypoxic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.117.300554

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conflicting results have been observed for the effect of Hap1 on the expression of ERG genes during anaerobic conditions.

    “However, conflicting results have been observed for the effect of Hap1 on the expression of ERG genes during anaerobic conditions [75,96,99,100].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bard M., Lees N. D., Turi T., Craft D., Cofrin L., et al. , 1993. Sterol synthesis and viability of erg11 (cytochrome P450 lanosterol demethylase) mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Lipids 28: 963–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campoy S., Adrio J. L., 2017. Antifungals. Biochem. Pharmacol. 133: 86–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lombardia L. J., Cadahia-Rodriguez J. L., Freire-Picos M. A., Gonzalez-Siso M. I., Rodriguez-Torres A. M., et al. , 2000. Transcript analysis of 203 novel genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in hap1 and rox1 mutant backgrounds. Genome 43: 881–886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Muren E., Oyen M., Barmark G., Ronne H., 2001. Identification of yeast deletion strains that are hypersensitive to brefeldin A or monensin, two drugs that affect intracellular transport. Yeast 18: 163–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Woods K., Höfken T., 2016. The zinc cluster proteins Upc2 and Ecm22 promote filamentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by sterol biosynthesis-dependent and -independent pathways. Mol. Microbiol. 99: 512–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Serratore, N. D., Baker, K. M., Macadlo, L. A., Gress, A. R., Powers, B. L., Atallah, N., Westerhouse, K. M., Hall, M. C., Weake, V. M., & Briggs, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Corresponding author
Briggs, Scott D
Venue
Genetics
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
1037-1055
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2776156805
Cited by
33
References
68
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY024905)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA023168, P30CA082709)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
epigenetic regulation, hypoxia, sterol homeostasis, ergosterol, sterol precursors, UPC2, HAP1, transcriptional repression, ERG11, ERG3, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Hypoxia, Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sterols, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Profiling, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review