Cited by 101Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Joint estimates of heterozygosity and runs of homozygosity for modern and ancient samples

Open access
Renaud, Gabriel, Hanghøj, Kristian, Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand, Willerslev, Eske, Orlando, Ludovic·2019·Genetics

Abstract

Both the total amount and the distribution of heterozygous sites within individual genomes are informative about the genetic diversity of the population they belong to. Detecting true heterozygous sites in ancient genomes is complicated by the generally limited coverage achieved and the presence of post-mortem damage inflating sequencing errors. Additionally, large runs of homozygosity found in the genomes of particularly inbred individuals and of domestic animals can skew estimates of genome-wide heterozygosity rates. Current computational tools aimed at estimating runs of homozygosity and genome-wide heterozygosity levels are generally sensitive to such limitations. Here, we introduce ROHan, a probabilistic method which substantially improves the estimate of heterozygosity rates both genome-wide and for genomic local windows. It combines a local Bayesian model and a Hidden Markov Model at the genome-wide level and can work both on modern and ancient samples. We show that our algorithm outperforms currently available methods for predicting heterozygosity rates for ancient samples. Specifically, ROHan can delineate large runs of homozygosity (at megabase scales) and produce a reliable confidence interval for the genome-wide rate of heterozygosity outside of such regions from modern genomes with a depth of coverage as low as 5-6× and down to 7-8× for ancient samples showing moderate DNA damage. We apply ROHan to a series of modern and ancient genomes previously published and revise available estimates of heterozygosity for humans, chimpanzees and horses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.119.302057

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 101

Authors
Renaud, G., Hanghøj, K., Korneliussen, T. S., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Renaud, Gabriel
Venue
Genetics
Published
2019-05-14
Volume
212
Issue
3
Pages
587-614
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2946021510
Cited by
101
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden (00013266)
  • European Commission (752657, HORIZON2020, 681605)
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF94)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R302-2018-2155, R155-2013-16338)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Université de Toulouse
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18SA0035006)
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
heterozygosity estimation, runs of homozygosity, ancient genomes, Rohan, hidden Markov models, Bayesian model, sequencing errors, inbreeding, human genome, chimpanzee genome, horse genome, genetic diversity
MeSH terms
DNA, Ancient, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Humans, Markov Chains, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review