Joint estimates of heterozygosity and runs of homozygosity for modern and ancient samples
Open accessAbstract
Both the total amount and the distribution of heterozygous sites within individual genomes are informative about the genetic diversity of the population they belong to. Detecting true heterozygous sites in ancient genomes is complicated by the generally limited coverage achieved and the presence of post-mortem damage inflating sequencing errors. Additionally, large runs of homozygosity found in the genomes of particularly inbred individuals and of domestic animals can skew estimates of genome-wide heterozygosity rates. Current computational tools aimed at estimating runs of homozygosity and genome-wide heterozygosity levels are generally sensitive to such limitations. Here, we introduce ROHan, a probabilistic method which substantially improves the estimate of heterozygosity rates both genome-wide and for genomic local windows. It combines a local Bayesian model and a Hidden Markov Model at the genome-wide level and can work both on modern and ancient samples. We show that our algorithm outperforms currently available methods for predicting heterozygosity rates for ancient samples. Specifically, ROHan can delineate large runs of homozygosity (at megabase scales) and produce a reliable confidence interval for the genome-wide rate of heterozygosity outside of such regions from modern genomes with a depth of coverage as low as 5-6× and down to 7-8× for ancient samples showing moderate DNA damage. We apply ROHan to a series of modern and ancient genomes previously published and revise available estimates of heterozygosity for humans, chimpanzees and horses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The implementation of the deamination probability model is taken from Renaud et al.
“The implementation for the above is taken from Renaud et al. [40].”
From <tt>SAFARI</tt> : pangenome alignment of ancient DNA using purine/pyrimidine encodings (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Renaud, G., Hanghøj, K., Korneliussen, T. S., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Renaud, Gabriel
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-14
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-614
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- PMC
- PMC6614887
- OpenAlex
- W2946021510
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Villum Fonden (00013266)
- European Commission (752657, HORIZON2020, 681605)
- National Research Foundation
- Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF94)
- Lundbeckfonden (R302-2018-2155, R155-2013-16338)
- Novo Nordisk
- Université de Toulouse
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18SA0035006)
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- heterozygosity estimation, runs of homozygosity, ancient genomes, Rohan, hidden Markov models, Bayesian model, sequencing errors, inbreeding, human genome, chimpanzee genome, horse genome, genetic diversity
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Ancient, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Humans, Markov Chains, Genotyping Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review