Citizen science, computing, and conservation: How can “Crowd AI” change the way we tackle large-scale ecological challenges?
Open accessAbstract
Camera traps - remote cameras that capture images of passing wildlife - have become a ubiquitous tool in ecology and conservation. Systematic camera trap surveys generate ‘Big Data’ across broad spatial and temporal scales, providing valuable information on environmental and anthropogenic factors affecting vulnerable wildlife populations. However, the sheer number of images amassed can quickly outpace researchers’ ability to manually extract data from these images (e.g., species identities, counts, and behaviors) in timeframes useful for making scientifically-guided conservation and management decisions. Here, we present ‘Snapshot Safari’ as a case study for merging citizen science and machine learning to rapidly generate highly accurate ecological Big Data from camera trap surveys. Snapshot Safari is a collaborative cross-continental research and conservation effort with 1500+ cameras deployed at over 40 eastern and southern Africa protected areas, generating millions of images per year. As one of the first and largest-scale camera trapping initiatives, Snapshot Safari spearheaded innovative developments in citizen science and machine learning. We highlight the advances made and discuss the issues that arose using each of these methods to annotate camera trap data. We end by describing how we combined human and machine classification methods (‘Crowd AI’) to create an efficient integrated data pipeline. Ultimately, by using a feedback loop in which humans validate machine learning predictions and machine learning algorithms are iteratively retrained on new human classifications, we can capitalize on the strengths of both methods of classification while mitigating the weaknesses. Using Crowd AI to quickly and accurately ‘unlock’ ecological Big Data for use in science and conservation is revolutionizing the way we take on critical environmental issues in the Anthropocene era.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citizen scientists help train and validate machine-learning models, creating human-AI feedback loops that improve classification performance over time.
“Citizen scientists are no longer just passive helpers—they now help train and validate machine-learning models, creating human–AI feedback loops that actually improve classification performance over time”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Palmer et al. 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Palmer, M. S., Willis, C., Barry, K., Packer, C., Moe, A., & Wassenberg, D. (2020). Exploring species interactions with "Snapshot Serengeti." CourseSource https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2020. · DOI
- Wearn, O. R., & Glover-Kapfer, P. (2017). Camera-trapping for conservation: a guide to best-practices. WWF Conservation Technology Series, 1(1), 181.
- Authors
- Palmer, M. S., Huebner, S. E., Willi, M., Fortson, L., & Packer, C.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Human Computation
- Publisher
- Human Computation Institute
- Published
- 2021-07-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 54-75
- ISSN
- 2330-8001 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3185939771
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1835530, 1619177, 1810586)
- National Geographic Society
- University of Wyoming
- National Research Foundation
- Nelson Mandela University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- citizen science, camera trap survey, machine learning, wildlife conservation, protected areas, Eastern and Southern Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review