The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transmission of Tool-making through Verbal and Non-verbal Communication: Preliminary Experiments in Levallois Flake Production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ohnuma et al.34 and Putt et al.38 found that verbal language did not represent an advantage over gestural communication.”
From Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Boeda, E. (1988a) Le concept Levallois et evaluation de son champ d'application. In L'Homme de Neandertal: Vol.4: La Technique (Otte, M., ed.), Liege, pp.13-26.
- Boeda. E. (1988b) Le concept laminaire: rupture et filiation avec le concept Levallois. In L'Homme de Neandertal: Vol.8: La Mutation (Otte, M., ed.), Liege, pp.41-59.
- Bordes, F. (1980) Le debitage Levallois et ses variantes. Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise 77 (2), 45-49.
- Breuil, H., and Kelley, H. (1956) Les eclats acheuleens a plane de frappe a facettes de Cagny-la-Garenne (Somme). Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise 53, 174-179.
- Caton-Thompson, G. (1952) Kharga Oasis in Prehistory, Athlone Press, London.
- Leakey, L. S. B. (1955) Working stone, bone, and wood. In A History of Technology: Vol.1: From Early Times to Fall of Ancient Empires (Singer, C., Holmyard, E. J., and Hall, A. R., ed.), Oxford Univ. Press, London, pp.128-143.
- Toth, N., and Schick, K. (1993) Early stone industries and inferences regarding language and cognition. In Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution (Gibson, K. R., and Ingold, T., ed.), Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.346-362.
- Washburn, S. L. (1969) The evolution of human behavior. In The Uniqueness of Man (Roslansky, J. D., ed.), North Holland, Groningen, pp.166-189.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lombao, D., Guardiola, M., & Mosquera, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- OHNUMA, K., AOKI, K., & AKAZAWA, A. T.
- Venue
- Anthropological Science
- Publisher
- Anthropological Society of Nippon
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-168
- ISSN
- 0918-7960
- 1348-8570
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
