Cited by 110Physical Activity and HealthWorkplace Health and Well-beingUrban Transport and Accessibility

Effect of the physical activities in leisure time and commuting to work on mental health

Open access
Ohta, Masanori, Mizoue, Tetsuya, Mishima, Norio, Ikeda, Masaharu·2007·Journal of Occupational Health

Abstract

Effect of the Physical Activities in Leisure Time and Commuting to Work on Mental Health: Masanori O hta, et al. Department of Health Development, University of Occupational and Environmental Health—Although some evidence suggests that exercise may improve mental health status, information regarding the intensity and duration of exercise is incomplete. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the association between physical activities in both leisure time and commuting to work and mental health. A questionnaire survey was conducted at three municipal offices in Japan. A total of 670 men and women completed the questionnaire. Mental health status was assessed by the 28‐item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Respondents were asked about weekly hours of leisure‐time exercise for four levels of exercise, and the volume of exercise was assessed using a metabolic equivalent task index. Information about commuting to work on foot or by bicycle was also obtained. The mean GHQ scores were calculated according to physical activity levels using analysis of covariance with adjustment of potential confounders including job stress. In men, the GHQ score decreased steadily with increasing levels of leisure‐time exercise, and an inverse association was evident even for mild intensity exercise. Moreover, the GHQ score decreased according to increasing duration of time on commuting to work by either walking or cycling in men, but not in women. These relations did not materially change after adjustment for potential confounding factors. In women, there was no significant association between any of the indices of physical activity. In conclusion, leisure‐time exercise and walking or cycling during commuting to work may be associated with better mental health in men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1539/joh.49.46

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual studies have shown that leisure-time physical activity has a stronger relationship with mental health and mental ill-health compared to work-related, transport, and household physical activity.

    “Further, a number of individual studies have shown that leisure-time PA has a stronger relationship with mental health and mental illhealth, compared to work-related PA, transport PA, and household PA. [13][14][15]”

    From Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Mental Health: A Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (p. 3) report that greater leisure-time exercise was associated with lower GHQ scores in men, supporting a relationship with mental health. They also report an association for walking or cycling to work in men; the paper does not establish that the leisure-time relationship was stronger, and its stated scope (p. 2) does not include household or work-related physical activity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 110

Authors
Ohta, M., Mizoue, T., Mishima, N., & Ikeda, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Ikemi Memorial Clinic of Mind‐Body Medicine Japan
  • Kitakyushu City Hospital Organization (JP)
Corresponding author
Ohta, Masanori
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health
Published
2007-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
46-52
ISSN
  • 1341-9145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-9585
OpenAlex
W2001130328
Cited by
110
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Occupational and Environmental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
physical activity, leisure-time exercise, commuting, mental health, walking, cycling, exercise intensity, exercise duration, General Health Questionnaire, occupational stress, sex differences, office workers
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Japan, Leisure Activities, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Transportation, Exercise, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review