Cited by 3Cancer survivorship and careCancer Risks and FactorsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effectiveness of an Internet Delivered Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention Provided to Breast Cancer Survivors

Open access
Dittus L, Kim·2015·Advances in Obesity, Weight Management & Control

Abstract

Purpose: Excess weight is associated with negative outcomes among breast cancer survivors.Our primary objective was to pilot test the value of an internet delivered behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention for breast cancer survivors.Methods: Stage 0-III breast cancer survivors with excess weight who did (CHEMO) and did not receive chemotherapy (NO CHEMO) were recruited to participate.The 6month BWL intervention included behavior modification strategies, calorie reduction and an increase in moderate exercise.The primary outcome was change in anthropometrics.Secondary outcomes were change in food intake and physical activity.Results: Fifty women were recruited (25 who received chemotherapy; 25 who did not receive chemotherapy) and 34 completed post testing.The results from both an intentto-treat analysis and analyzing including only subjects who completed the intervention identified that both the CHEMO and NO CHEMO groups lost significant weight.Participants in the CHEMO and NO CHEMO groups who completed the intervention lost 4.5% and 7.5% of baseline body weight respectively.The NO CHEMO group lost a significant percent of their baseline body fat while the CHEMO group did not.The intervention resulted in a significant fat free mass loss for the CHEMO group, while fat free mass was preserved in the NO CHEMO group.The calorie deficit for the NO CHEMO group was significant while the CHEMO group did not achieve a significant reduction in calories consumed.No exercise parameter changed in either group.Conclusion: Individuals with breast cancer experience significant weight loss with an internet delivered intervention.Women who received chemotherapy lost less weight, less body fat and more fat free mass than survivors who did not receive chemotherapy.Despite variable success between groups, an internet based BWL program results in weight loss in a breast cancer survivor population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15406/aowmc.2015.02.00021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 3

Authors
Dittus L, K.
Venue
Advances in Obesity, Weight Management & Control
Published
2015-05-07
Volume
2
Issue
3
ISSN
2378-3168 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187044019
Cited by
3
References
40
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advances in Obesity Weight Management & Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, online intervention, behavioral weight loss, obesity, chemotherapy, weight loss, fat mass, fat-free mass, calorie reduction, physical activity, dietary intake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review