Logic Model Evaluation of Teaching Assistance in Islamic Teacher Education
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Experiential learning through teaching assistance programs plays a vital role in the professional development of prospective teachers, especially within Islamic higher education contexts. However, few evaluation frameworks comprehensively explore the relationships among program components and their direct effects on educational outcomes. This study employs the Logic Model framework to systematically analyze the Teaching Assistance Program at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, during the 2024–2025 academic year. By mapping inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and long-term impacts, the study offers an integrated evaluation of how teaching assistance fosters professional competencies and instructional quality development. Utilizing a qualitative approach, including semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and document analysis, with participation from 114 sixth-semester students across nine study programs, the research uncovers the critical influence of structured mentorship and contextual adaptation across disciplines. It also reveals challenges such as inconsistent supervision and lack of standardized practices. This study contributes to advancing program evaluation methodologies in Islamic teacher education by demonstrating the utility of the Logic Model to reveal program dynamics and inform strategic enhancement of teaching assistance frameworks. The findings carry significant implications for promoting equitable, coherent, and sustainable teacher preparation programs within diverse institutional environments. Abstrak Pembelajaran berbasis pengalaman melalui program bantuan pengajaran memegang peranan penting dalam pengembangan profesional calon guru, khususnya dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi Islam. Namun, sedikit kerangka evaluasi yang secara komprehensif mengeksplorasi hubungan antar komponen program dan dampak langsungnya terhadap hasil pendidikan. Studi ini menggunakan kerangka Kerja Logic Model untuk secara sistematis menganalisis Program Bantuan Pengajaran di Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan, UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, selama tahun akademik 2024–2025. Dengan memetakan input, aktivitas, keluaran, hasil, dan dampak jangka panjang, penelitian ini menawarkan evaluasi terpadu tentang bagaimana bantuan pengajaran mendorong kompetensi profesional dan pengembangan kualitas instruksional. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang meliputi wawancara semi-terstruktur, diskusi kelompok fokus, dan analisis dokumen, dengan partisipasi 114 mahasiswa semester enam dari sembilan program studi, penelitian ini mengungkap pengaruh penting pendampingan terstruktur dan adaptasi kontekstual lintas disiplin. Studi ini juga mengidentifikasi tantangan seperti pengawasan yang tidak konsisten dan kurangnya praktik standar. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan metodologi evaluasi program dalam pendidikan guru Islam dengan menunjukkan kegunaan Logic Model untuk mengungkap dinamika program dan memberikan informasi untuk peningkatan strategis kerangka bantuan pengajaran. Temuan penelitian memiliki implikasi signifikan untuk mendorong program persiapan guru yang adil, koheren, dan berkelanjutan dalam lingkungan institusional yang beragam.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Logic Model functions not only as an evaluation tool but also as a program planning framework that helps design activity flow logically.
“Selain itu, penelitian Aziz dan Amir (2025) serta Aminulloh et al. (2025) menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan ini tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat evaluasi, tetapi juga sebagai kerangka perencanaan program yang membantu dalam merancang alur kegiatan secara logis.”
From Evaluasi Program Pendidikan di SMK: Systematic Literature Review Terhadap Logic Model dan Theory-Based Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as Aminulloh et al. (2025)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Abitolkha, A. M., Ismail, A. N., & Hady, Y. (2020). The Interrelation of Curriculum Development with Contextualization of Islamic Education Learning in Junior High School. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 7(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v7i1.13843 · DOI
- Agustina, S., Aulia, F. R., Utami, S. H., Putri, S. S., Studi, P., Fisika, P., Studi, P., Kimia, P., Studi, P., Sosiologi, P., Mengajar, A., & Hidup, A. (2024). Implementasi Program Kerja Asistensi Mengajar Mahasiswa FKIP Universitas Mataram di SMAN 1 Labuapi. 3(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpimi.v3i2.3795 · DOI
- Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Malekan, M. (2020). Saudi science teachers' perceptions of the cultural factors influencing elementary students' science learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(4), 1143–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09960-9 · DOI
- Anh, V. T. K. (2018). Evaluation Models in Educational Program: Strengths and Weaknesses. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4252 · DOI
- Armstrong, S. N., Lupinski, K., Burcin, M. M., Kato, K., & Kaufman, M. (2021). Evaluation of a Teaching Assistant Program in Online Education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2021.11.1.04 · DOI
- Barkhoda, J., Azizi, A., & Abdulrahman, B. S. (2025). Bridging Worlds: enhancing English Teaching through a culture-based approach in Iranian Kurdistan. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2464308 · DOI
- Bautista, A., & Oretga-Ruiz, R. (2017). Teacher Professional Development: International Perspectives and Approaches. Psychology, Society, Education,7(3). https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.1020 · DOI
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology; In qualittaive research in psychology. Uwe Bristol, 3(2), 77–101. https://psychology.ukzn.ac.za/?mdocs-file=1176
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yul, F. A., Saputra, H. K., Yuberta, A., & Arianto (2026) · Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal · doi:10.54373/imeij.v7i3.5532
- Authors
- Aminulloh, Padmadewi, N. N., Utami, I. L. P., Yanyan, B., & Jiaxin, L.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID)
- Qingdao Institute of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society
- Published
- 2025-06-28
- Pages
- 126-140
- ISSN
- 2356-1416 (ISSN-L)
- 2442-9848
- OpenAlex
- W7127647298
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- TARBIYA Journal of Education in Muslim Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- E-Journal Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University (UIN) Jakarta (Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Islamic Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- teaching assistance program, Islamic teacher education, experiential learning, mentoring, teaching quality, supervision, program evaluation, teacher education curriculum, Islamic higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
