The DOI matches its Crossref record.
METODE KRITIK MATAN HADIS MENURUT PANDANGAN MUHADDITSIN MUTAQADDIMIN
Open accessAbstract
Persoalan kritik matan hadis sampai saat ini masih menjadi bahan perdebatan di kalangan para peneliti hadis. Sejumlah peneliti berpendapat bahwa kritik terhadap hadis yang selama ini ada, tidak menyentuh kepada matan, melainkan hanya kritik kepada sanad saja Metode ahli-ahli hadis dinilai lemah oleh kaum orientalis dan yang sependapat dengan mereka. Karena itu mereka menolak metode itu dan membuat metode sendiri yang kemudian dikenal dengan metode kritik matan hadis. Sementara kelompok kedua yang menilai bahwa metode kritik hadis yang selama ini ada yang mengandung beberapa kelemahan dan mereka pun menawarkan metode kritik hadis versi mereka. Metode itu adalah common link dan isnadcum-matn. Ada beberapa metode yang digunakan oleh ulama mutaqadimin yaitu metode membandingkan dua riwayat hadis, rukakh lafz al-Hadith dan Jauh Maknanya.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Tābiʿīn continued the practice of textual criticism introduced by the companions, such as the techniques of muqāranah and muʿāraḍah, both of which were extensively used by them.
“The Tabiʿīn also continued the practice of textual criticism introduced by the companions, such as the techniques of muqāranah and muʿāraḍah, both of which were extensively used by them (Abdul Aziz, 2015;al-Munawar, 2020;Devi, 2020).”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as al-Munawar, 2020
The passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says the companions used both muqāranah and muʿāraḍah, and that muʿāraḍah was practiced more extensively in the subsequent Tābiʿīn period. It does not establish that the Tābiʿīn extensively used muqāranah as well. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe requirements of textual criticism at the time have not been entirely unified into a theoretically consistent system, creating divergences of opinion regarding evaluation parameters.
“Nonetheless, the requirements of textual criticism at the time have not been entirely unified into a theoretically consistent system, which has created divergences of opinion regarding the parameters of evaluation (al-Munawar, 2020;Kholis, 2021).”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as al-Munawar, 2020
The Data availability section (page not provided) says textual criticism of hadith remains debated among researchers, supporting the claim that views diverge. But the paper does not say that its requirements lacked a theoretically consistent, unified system or that this caused disagreement over evaluation parameters. Its discussion of earlier scholars’ criteria in the Abstract (page not provided) does not establish that causal explanation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWestern researchers have insisted that early Muslim critics concentrated on isnād rather than matn analysis.
“Syarifuddin & Zaiful Rosyid (2019) and al-Munawar (2020) asserted that Western researchers have insisted that early Muslim critics concentrated on isnād rather than matn analysis.”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as al-Munawar, 2020
Classical scholars judged the matn based on its correspondence with the Qurʾān, more authentic hadiths, definitive legal constructs, and rationality.
“Classical scholars judged the matn based on its correspondence with the Qurʾān, more authentic hadiths, and definitive legal constructs, as well as its correspondence with rationality (al-Munawar, 2020).”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as al-Munawar, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Yang berpendapat seperti pendapat kedua ini adalah kaum orientalis pada umumnya, utamanya Joseph Schacht dan G.H.A. Juynboll. Lihat Joseph Schacht, The Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon press, 1959), h.
- G.H.A. Juynboll, "Nafi', the mawla of Ibn 'Umar and His Position in Muslim Hadith Literature", (Early Islamic Period), dalam Der Islam h. 208 6 Ignaz Goldziher, Muslim Studies, trans. C.N. Barber dan S.M. Stern, vol. II (London: George Allen and UNWIN LTD, 1971), h. 19
- Joseph Schacht, The Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon press, 1959), h.163
- G.H.A. Juynboll, Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chonology Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), h.71
- H.A. Juynboll, Muslim Tradition, h. 75. Lihat juga H.A.R. Gibb, Mohammedanism An Historical Survey (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), h.55-56 12 Harald Motzki, "The Murder of Ibn Abi Huqayq: On the Origin and Reliability of Some Maghazi-Report", dalam Harald Motzki (ed.), The Biography of Muhannad . The Issue of Sources, (Leiden: Brill, 2000), h. 174 13 Ignaz Goldziher, Muhammedanische Studien (Hildesheim: tp, 1961), h. 200
- Nur Sulaiman PL, 'Memahami Hadis dengan Pendekatan Sosiologi", dalam Jurnal Hunafa Edisi No. 7 Vol. 3.1 Agustus 2000 M / Jumadil Awal 1421 H.,,h.27 31 al-Jawabi, Juhud al-Muhaddithin,h. 94
- Joseph Schacht, The Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, Oxford: Clarendon press, 1959
- G.H.A. Juynboll, Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chonology Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches
Razak, N. M. A. M., Nazri, M. A., Majid, L. A., Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2025) · Global Journal Al-Thaqafah · doi:10.7187/gjatsi122025-2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Munawar, S. A. H.
- Venue
- Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
- Published
- 2020-04-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-165
- ISSN
- 2460-9692 (ISSN-L)
- 2721-754X
- OpenAlex
- W3024875239
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ushuluna Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Medical Research and Islamic Perspectives
- Keywords
- hadith criticism methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
