The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants (500 to 999 Grams) Over a 12-Year Period
Abstract
Objective. Advances in neonatology have contributed to improved survival for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Neurodevelopmental outcome is usually reported for a single large group of infants rather than according to smaller birth weight groups because of small numbers. Our purpose was to review the neurodevelopmental outcome of a large group of ELBW infants and examine differential outcome according to birth weight. Study Design. A total of 446 infants born between 1979 and 1991, with a birth weight of 500 to 999 g, were followed to mean age 55 months ± 33 standard deviation. Univariate analyses of medical risk factors of birth weight, gestational age, year of birth, growth retardation, gender, inborn/outborn status, days on oxygen, intracranial hemorrhage, and social risk in relation to outcome were conducted on the group as a whole. Neurologic/developmental outcome was also analyzed by 100-g weight groups. Results. A total of 61% of all infants were completely normal, with no neurologic, neurosensory, or cognitive deficits. There was no association between outcome and birth weight. There was a strong association between intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) grade III or IV and/or cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) and abnormal outcome (Somers' D = .17) and ICH III/IV and/or cystic PVL and cognitive outcome (Kendall's tau = .15). Mild to moderate cognitive delays were associated with chronic lung disease (oxygen >60 days) (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 17.53) or high social risk (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 22.17). Conclusion. In this study of ELBW infants, low birth weight was not associated with abnormal outcome. The risk factors of ICH III-IV/cystic PVL, chronic lung disease, and high social risk were associated with abnormal outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meta-Analysis of Neurobehavioral Outcomes in Very Preterm and/or Very Low Birth Weight Children
Aarnoudse-Moens, C. S. H., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., van Goudoever, J. B., & Oosterlaan, J. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2816 · Cited by 1,587
Hamrick, S. E. G., Miller, S. P., Leonard, C., Glidden, D. V., Goldstein, R., Ramaswamy, V., Piecuch, R., & Ferriero, D. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.042 · Cited by 329
Self-citationMechanisms of perinatal brain injury
Inder, T. E., & Volpe, J. J. (2000) · Seminars in Neonatology · doi:10.1053/siny.1999.0112 · Cited by 284
Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener With Low Birth Weight Infants
Leonard, C. H. (2001) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/26.1.33 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Piecuch, R. E., Leonard, C. H., Cooper, B. A., & Sehring, S. A.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 633-639
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1999104473
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants (500 to 999 Grams) Over a 12-Year Period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.100.4.633
- The paper
- Piecuch, R. E., Leonard, C. H., Cooper, B. A., & Sehring, S. A. (1997). Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants (500 to 999 Grams) Over a 12-Year Period. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.100.4.633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.