Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Findings on Cranial Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preterm Infants

Maalouf, Elia F., Duggan, Philip J., Counsell, Serena J., Rutherford, Mary A., Cowan, Frances, Azzopardi, Denis, Edwards, A. David·2001·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective.: To compare findings on hard copies of cranial ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained between birth and term in a group of preterm infants. Participants and Methods.: Infants born at or below a gestational age of 30 weeks who underwent cranial US scan and MRI on the same day were eligible for this study. Infants underwent, whenever possible, 3 scans between birth and term. We calculated the predictive probability (PP) of US findings as a predictor of findings on MRI. Results.: Sixty-two paired MRI and US studies were performed between birth and term in 32 infants born at a median gestational age of 27 (range: 23–30) weeks and a median birth weight of 918 (530–1710) grams. US predicted some MRI findings accurately: germinal layer hemorrhage (GLH) on US had a PP of 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.70–0.90) for the presence of GLH on MRI, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on US had a PP of 0.85 (0.76–0.94) for the presence of IVH on MRI, and severe white matter (WM) echogenicity on US had a PP of 0.96 (0.92–1.0) for the presence of WM hemorrhagic parenchymal infarction on MRI. Other MRI changes were less well-predicted: mild or no WM echogenicity on US had a PP of 0.54 (0.41–0.66) for the presence of normal WM signal intensity on MRI, and moderate or severe WM echogenicity on US had a PP of 0.54 (0.42–0.66) for the presence of small petechial WM hemorrhage and/or diffuse excessive high-signal intensity (DEHSI) in the WM on T2-weighted images on MRI. However, mild/moderate or severe WM echogenicity on US scans performed at ≥7 days after birth had a PP of 0.72 (0.58–0.87) for the presence of WM hemorrhage and/or DEHSI on MRI. There were no cases of cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Conclusion.: US accurately predicted the presence of GLH, IVH, and hemorrhagic parenchymal infarction on MRI. However, its ability to predict the presence of DEHSI and small petechial hemorrhages in the WM on T2 weighted images is not as good, but improves on scans performed at ≥7 days after birth. In addition, normal WM echogenicity on US is not a good predictor of normal WM signal intensity on MRI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.107.4.719

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Maalouf, E. F., Duggan, P. J., Counsell, S. J., Rutherford, M. A., Cowan, F., Azzopardi, D., & Edwards, A. D.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
719-727
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2060021087
Cited by
377
References
0
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Findings on Cranial Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preterm Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.107.4.719
The paper
Maalouf, E. F., Duggan, P. J., Counsell, S. J., Rutherford, M. A., Cowan, F., Azzopardi, D., & Edwards, A. D. (2001). Comparison of Findings on Cranial Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.4.719

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.