The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical Growth and Current Health Status of Infants Who Were of Extremely Low Birth Weight and Controls at Adolescence
Abstract
Objectives.: To compare the physical growth, current health status, and utilization of health care resources by extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and control (C) adolescents and to look at changes over time. Methods.: A longitudinal regional cohort study was conducted. Growth measures were converted to z scores on the National Center for Health Statistics growth curves. Information regarding current health status/health care utilization was obtained by parental interviews. Results.: A total of 154 (91%) of 169 ELBW survivors between 12 and 16 years and 125 (86%) of 145 controls participated. Neurosensory impairments were present in 28% of ELBW survivors and 2% of control participants. Mean z scores for both height and weight were below 0 for ELBW survivors (weight: −0.35; height: −0.55) compared with control participants (weight: 0.40; height: 0.28). However, among ELBW survivors, significant catch-up growth occurred in both parameters between age 8 and adolescence but remained stable among control participants. ELBW survivors had a higher prevalence of visual problems (57% vs 21%), seizures (7% vs 1%), developmental delay (26% vs 1%), learning disabilities (34% vs 10%), and hyperactivity (9% vs 2%) and used more specialists and community resources than did control participants. Conclusions.: Although physical growth continues to be compromised and substantial morbidity remains among ELBW survivors at adolescence, there seems to be some catch-up growth, a reduction in the prevalence of acute health problems, and a decrease in the utilization of medical resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Childhood obesity: future directions and research priorities
Hill, J. O., & Trowbridge, F. L. (1998) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.101.3.570 · Cited by 200
Broyles, R. S., Tyson, J. E., Heyne, E. T., Heyne, R. J., Hickman, J. F., Swint, M., Adams, S. S., West, L. A., Pomeroy, N., Hicks, P. J., et al. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.16.2070 · Cited by 109
Cited by
An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood
Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60136-1 · Cited by 2,818
Self-citationWalsh, M. C., Morris, B. H., Wrage, L. A., Vohr, B. R., Poole, W. K., Tyson, J. E., Wright, L. L., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Stoll, B. J., & Fanaroff, A. A. (2005) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.047 · Cited by 422
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Infants Born Prematurely
AYLWARD, G. P. (2005) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/00004703-200512000-00008 · Cited by 365
Statement on the Care of the Child with Chronic Lung Disease of Infancy and Childhood
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.168.3.356 · Cited by 338
Laptook, A. R., O' Shea, T. M., Shankaran, S., Bhaskar, B., & and the NICHD Neonatal Network (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0667 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B. L., Streiner, D. L., & Burrows, E.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 407-415
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2170895352
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Growth and Current Health Status of Infants Who Were of Extremely Low Birth Weight and Controls at Adolescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.108.2.407
- The paper
- Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B. L., Streiner, D. L., & Burrows, E. (2001). Physical Growth and Current Health Status of Infants Who Were of Extremely Low Birth Weight and Controls at Adolescence. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.