Lumbar Puncture in Pediatric Bacterial Meningitis: Defining the Time Interval for Recovery of Cerebrospinal Fluid Pathogens After Parenteral Antibiotic Pretreatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite the lack of evidence defining a time interval during which cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture yield will not be affected by previous antibiotic therapy, recent publications cite a "minimum window" of 2 to 3 hours for recovery of bacterial pathogens after parenteral antibiotic administration. We conducted a retrospective review of children with bacterial meningitis to describe the rate at which parenteral antibiotic pretreatment sterilizes CSF cultures. METHODS: The medical records of pediatric patients who were discharged from a tertiary children's hospital during a 5-year period with the final diagnosis of bacterial meningitis or suspected bacterial meningitis were reviewed. The decay in yield of CSF cultures over time was evaluated in patients with lumbar punctures (LP) delayed until after initiation of parenteral antibiotics and in patients with serial LPs before and after initiation of parenteral antibiotics. RESULTS: The pathogens that infected the 128 study patients were Streptococcus pneumoniae (49), Neisseria meningitidis (37), group B Streptococcus (21), Haemophilus influenzae (8), other organisms (11), and undetermined (3). Thirty-nine patients (30%) had first LPs after initiation of parenteral antibiotics, and 55 (43%) had serial LPs before and after initiation of parenteral antibiotics. After >/=50 mg/kg of a third-generation cephalosporin, 3 of 9 LPs in meningococcal meningitis were sterile within 1 hour, occurring as early as 15 minutes, and all were sterile by 2 hours. With pneumococcal disease, the first negative CSF culture occurred at 4.3 hours, with 5 of 7 cultures negative from 4 to 10 hours after initiation of parenteral antibiotics. Reduced susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics occurred in 11 of 46 pneumococcal isolates. Group B streptococcal cultures were positive through the first 8 hours after parenteral antibiotics. Blood cultures were positive in 74% of cases without pretreatment and in 57% to 68% of cases with negative CSF cultures. CONCLUSIONS: The temptation to initiate antimicrobial therapy may override the principle of obtaining adequate pretreatment culture material. The present study demonstrates that CSF sterilization may occur more rapidly after initiation of parenteral antibiotics than previously suggested, with complete sterilization of meningococcus within 2 hours and the beginning of sterilization of pneumococcus by 4 hours into therapy. Lack of adequate culture material may result in inability to tailor therapy to antimicrobial susceptibility or in unnecessarily prolonged treatment if the clinical presentation and laboratory data cannot exclude the possibility of bacterial meningitis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSF culture is the gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, but its sensitivity varies between 50% and 90% depending on bacterium type and bacterial load, and decreases when antibiotic treatment has been started prior to CSF collection.
“While CSF culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, its sensitivity varies between 50% and 90%, dependent on bacterium type and bacterial load, and decreases when antibiotic treatment has been started prior to the CSF collection (12–14).”
From Molecular diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
CSF may be rendered sterile by administration of empirical antibiotics, within 2 h in meningococcal meningitis and within 4 h in pneumococcal meningitis.
“CSF may be rendered sterile by administration of empirical antibiotics, within 2 h in meningococcal meningitis and within 4 h in pneumococcal meningitis.43”
From Community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis in adults: a clinical update (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 370
- Authors
- Kanegaye, J. T., Soliemanzadeh, P., & Bradley, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- School of Medicine and
- Corresponding author
- Soliemanzadeh, Peyman
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1169-1174
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2170431908
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- pediatric bacterial meningitis, lumbar puncture timing, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Haemophilus influenzae, third-generation cephalosporins, beta-lactam resistance, blood culture positivity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Meningitis, Haemophilus, Meningitis, Meningococcal, Meningitis, Pneumococcal, Spinal Puncture, Time Factors, Confidence Intervals, Meningitis, Bacterial, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review