A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of SLI381 (Adderall XR) in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Abstract
Objective. SLI381 (Adderall XR) is a 2-component extended-release capsule formulation of Adderall designed to produce a therapeutic effect that lasts throughout the day with 1 morning dose. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SLI381 compared with placebo in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children in a naturalistic school and home setting. A secondary objective was to assess the diurnal variation in responses based on morning and afternoon assessments. Methods. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 47 sites. After a 1-week washout of any previous stimulant medication, patients were randomized to receive single-daily morning doses of placebo or SLI381 10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg for 3 weeks. Participants aged 6 to 12 years inclusive who satisfied Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria diagnosis of ADHD were included. The primary efficacy parameter was the Conners Global Index Scale for Teachers. Secondary efficacy parameters included the Conners Global Index Scale for Parents, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for improvement, and the Parent Global Assessment for improvement. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events, laboratory tests, and vital signs at each visit during the study. Physical examinations and electrocardiograms were performed at the screening and the end of the study. Results. Five hundred eighty-four children were randomized, 563 were included in the intent-to-treat population, and 509 completed the entire study. Intention-to-treat analysis of Conners Global Index Scale for Teachers and Conners Global Index Scale for Parents scores revealed significant improvement in morning, afternoon, and late afternoon behavior for all active treatment groups versus placebo. All active treatment groups showed significant dose-related improvement in behavior from baseline. Both the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for improvement and Parent Global Assessment for improvement showed all doses of SLI381 to be superior to placebo at treatment end and both confirmed the dose-response relationship between improvement and the SLI381 dose. The incidence of spontaneously reported adverse events was low and similar for active treatments and placebo. Conclusions. SLI381 produced consistent, dose-related improvements on all measures of efficacy. The extended-release nature of the SLI381 formulation was shown by continued, significant improvement in afternoon assessments by teachers and afternoon and late afternoon assessments by parents. The time course and therapeutic effects of SLI381 suggests that this medication is an efficacious once-daily treatment for children with ADHD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The adverse events reported in this study were similar in nature to those reported in studies of other stimulants and included decreased appetite, insomnia, headache, irritability, upper abdominal pain, and affect lability.
“The AEs reported here were similar in nature to those reported in studies of other stimulants and included decreased appetite, insomnia, headache, irritability, upper abdominal pain, and affect lability [10,13,27-29].”
From A 13-hour laboratory school study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2009) · cites this paper as [28]
One larger study of SLI381 with longer exposure appeared to confirm the observation of apparent excellent tolerability of SLI381.
“One larger study of SLI381 with longer exposure appeared to confirm our observation of apparent excellent tolerability of SLI381 (Biederman et al., 2002).”
From Analog Classroom Assessment of a Once-Daily Mixed Amphetamine Formulation, SLI381 (ADDERALL XR), in Children With ADHD (2003) · cites this paper as Biederman et al., 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 180
- Authors
- Biederman, J., Lopez, F. A., Boellner, S. W., & Chandler, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Children’s Developmental Center, Maitland, Florida
- Clinical Study Centers, Little Rock, Arkansas
- North Carolina Neuropsychiatry, Chapel Hill, North Carolina on behalf of the SLI381.301 Study Group
- ORCID
- Biederman, Joseph
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 258-266
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2029569572
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Keywords
- Adderall XR, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, sustained-release formulation, once-daily dosing, stimulant medication, dose-response relationship, diurnal variation, adverse events, treatment efficacy and safety
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamines, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Schools, Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review