The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pediatric Exposure and Potential Toxicity of Phthalate Plasticizers
Abstract
This Technical Report was retired January 2011.: Phthalates are plasticizers that are added to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) products to impart flexibility and durability. They are produced in high volume and generate extensive though poorly defined human exposures and unique childhood exposures. Phthalates are animal carcinogens and can cause fetal death, malformations, and reproductive toxicity in laboratory animals. Toxicity profiles and potency vary by specific phthalate. The extent of these toxicities and their applicability to humans remains incompletely characterized and controversial. Two phthalates, diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and diisononyl phthalate (DINP), have received considerable attention recently because of specific concerns about pediatric exposures. Like all phthalates, DEHP and DINP are ubiquitous contaminants in food, indoor air, soils, and sediments. DEHP is used in toys and medical devices. DINP is a major plasticizer used in children’s toys. Scientific panels, advocacy groups, and industry groups have analyzed the literature on DEHP and DINP and have come to different conclusions about their safety. The controversy exists because risk to humans must be extrapolated from animal data that demonstrate differences in toxicity by species, route of exposure, and age at exposure and because of persistent uncertainties in human exposure data. This report addresses sensitive endpoints of reproductive and developmental toxicity and the unique aspects of pediatric exposures to phthalates that generate concern. DEHP and DINP are used as specific examples to illustrate the controversy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of Seven Urinary Phthalate Metabolites in a Human Reference Population
Blount, B. C., Silva, M. J., Caudill, S. P., Needham, L. L., Pirkle, J. L., Sampson, E. J., Lucier, G. W., Jackson, R. J., & Brock, J. W. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108979 · Cited by 634
Cited by
Food Packaging—Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues
Marsh, K., & Bugusu, B. (2007) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x · Cited by 1,919
Hauser, R., & Calafat, A. M. (2005) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2004.017590 · Cited by 941
A Review of Biomonitoring of Phthalate Exposures
Wang, Y., Zhu, H., & Kannan, K. (2019) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics7020021 · Cited by 755
Main, K. M., Mortensen, G. K., Kaleva, M. M., Boisen, K. A., Damgaard, I. N., Chellakooty, M., Schmidt, I. M., Suomi, A.-M., Virtanen, H. E., Petersen, J. H., et al. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8075 · Cited by 696
Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Phthalates
Lyche, J. L., Gutleb, A. C., Bergman, Å., Eriksen, G. S., Murk, A. J., Ropstad, E., Saunders, M., & Skaare, J. U. (2009) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400903094091 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Shea, K. M., & Committee on Environmental Health
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1474
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2093765093
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pediatric Exposure and Potential Toxicity of Phthalate Plasticizers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.111.6.1467
- The paper
- Shea, K. M., & Committee on Environmental Health. (2003). Pediatric Exposure and Potential Toxicity of Phthalate Plasticizers. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.6.1467
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.