The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning, Cognitive, and Attentional Problems in Adolescents Born Small for Gestational Age
Abstract
Objective. To determine whether the presence, severity, or symmetry of growth restriction in term infants is an independent risk factor for learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescence. Methods. A total of 7388 term infants have been followed prospectively since birth. At 14 years, 5059 mothers completed a Child Behavior Checklist and provided information on their child’s school progress. A total of 5051 adolescents completed a Youth Self Report, with 3703 also undergoing psychometric testing with Ravens Progressive Matrices and Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) reading subtest. Outcomes were compared on the basis of birth weight groups and measures of body symmetry and were adjusted for the level of social risk at birth. Results. Adolescents who were born small for gestational age (SGA), when compared with their appropriately grown counterparts (>10th percentile), were more likely to experience learning difficulties, with a higher prevalence in those of birth weight ≤3rd percentile. Girls of birth weight ≤3rd percentile were more likely to have attentional problems and low WRAT reading scores. There was no significant difference in Ravens IQ or mean WRAT reading scores between SGA and non-SGA groups. There was no association between body symmetry and any of the outcomes studied. Conclusions. SGA status seems to have only modest independent effects on learning, cognition, and attention in adolescence. Severity but not symmetry of growth restriction predicted learning difficulties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time
Raven, J. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735 · Cited by 1,560
Vaughn, M. L., Riccio, C. A., Hynd, G. W., & Hall, J. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Child Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2604_3 · Cited by 104
Cited by
sagvolden, T., johansen, E. B., aase, H., & russell, V. A. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000075 · Cited by 1,035
The Fetal Matrix: Evolution, Development and Disease
Gluckman, P., & Hanson, M. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139106955 · Cited by 460
Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction
Pallotto, E. K., & Kilbride, H. W. (2006) · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00003081-200606000-00008 · Cited by 427
Leitner, Y., Fattal-Valevski, A., Geva, R., Eshel, R., Toledano-Alhadef, H., Rotstein, M., Bassan, H., Radianu, B., Bitchonsky, O., Jaffa, A. J., et al. (2007) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073807302605 · Cited by 332
Preterm birth and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in schoolchildren
Lindström, K., Lindblad, F., & Hjern, A. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1279 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Keeffe, M. J., O’Callaghan, M., Williams, G. M., Najman, J. M., & Bor, W.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-307
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2095153707
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning, Cognitive, and Attentional Problems in Adolescents Born Small for Gestational Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.112.2.301
- The paper
- O’Keeffe, M. J., O’Callaghan, M., Williams, G. M., Najman, J. M., & Bor, W. (2003). Learning, Cognitive, and Attentional Problems in Adolescents Born Small for Gestational Age. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.2.301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.