Ultrasound imaging of milk ejection in the breast of lactating women
Abstract
Objective Currently, the methods for assessing milk ejection in women include serial sampling of plasma oxytocin and measurement of intraductal pressure, both of which are invasive and may induce stress. We hypothesized that milk ejection would cause an increase in milk-duct diameter that could be observed noninvasively with ultrasound, and this could be used to investigate the physiology of milk ejection in women. Methods One milk duct was scanned in the unsuckled breast in 2 groups of mothers: group BB (n = 21) for the beginning of a breastfeed and group EB (n = 24) for the entire breastfeed. A duct also was monitored for a 5-minute period on 2 separate days in the absence of factors that may induce milk ejection in group EB to provide a baseline duct diameter. Milk intake at a breastfeed was measured by test weighing. Results A significant increase in milk-duct diameter was observed when milk ejection was sensed and/or the infant changed its swallowing pattern in both groups. Multiple increases and decreases (mean: 2.5 per breastfeed; standard deviation: 1.5; n = 62) in duct diameter occurred in group EB. Duct diameter remained relatively stable between breastfeeds (coefficient of variation: 1.4%-8.3%). Infant milk intake was positively related to the number of milk ejections (r2 =.365; n = 57). Conclusions Ultrasound is an objective, noninvasive technique for detecting milk ejection by observing an increase in milk-duct diameter. However, this technique requires an experi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within the first minute of infant suckling or stimulation with a breast pump, milk ejection takes place.
“Within the first minute of infant suckling or stimulation with a breast pump, milk ejection takes place (Ramsay et al., 2004).”
From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Ramsay et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 291
- Authors
- Ramsay, D. T., Kent, J. C., Owens, R. A., & Hartmann, P. E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical and Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Life and Physical Sciences
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-367
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1971494014
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medela
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Keywords
- milk ejection, breast ultrasound, lactation, breastfeeding, infant milk intake, oxytocin, non-invasive assessment, intraductal pressure
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Infant, Milk Ejection, Milk, Human, Ultrasonography, Mammary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review