The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Term Perinatal Brain Injury: A Comparison With Site of Lesion and Time From Birth
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to establish a more objective method for confirming tissue injury in term neonates who present with early seizures that are believed to be hypoxic-ischemic in origin. Methods. We studied the relationship between contemporaneous diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in 63 symptomatic term-born neonates and 15 control term infants performed in the neonatal period. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were obtained for multiple regions of the brain. Results. ADC values in the 15 control infants were 1 (1–1.15) (median [range]) × 10−3/mm2/second in the thalami and 1.1 (1–1.3) × 10−3/mm2/second in the lentiform nuclei, 1.5 (1.3–1.7) × 10−3/mm2/second in the centrum semiovale, 1.6 (1.46–1.7) × 10−3/mm2/second in the anterior white matter (WM), and 1.55 (1.35–1.85) × 10−3/mm2/second in the posterior WM with little variation over time. ADC values were significantly reduced in the first week after severe injury to either WM or basal ganglia and thalami (BGT), but values normalized at the end of the first week and then increased during week 2. ADC values were either normal or increased in moderate BGT and WM lesions when compared with controls. ADC values < 1.1 × 10−3/mm2/second were always associated with WM infarction and values <0.8 × 10−3/mm2/second with thalamic infarction. Conclusion. A reduced ADC soon after delivery allows the presence of tissue infarction to be confirmed at a time when conventional imaging changes may be subtle. However, as both moderate WM and BGT lesions may have normal or increased ADC values, a normal ADC value during the first week does not signify normal tissue. ADC values should always be measured in combination with visual analysis of both conventional and diffusion-weighed images for maximum detection of pathologic tissue, and the timing of the scan needs to be taken into account when interpreting the results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912
Cited by
Patterns of Brain Injury in Neonates Exposed to Perinatal Sentinel Events
Okereafor, A., Allsop, J., Counsell, S. J., Fitzpatrick, J., Azzopardi, D., Rutherford, M. A., & Cowan, F. M. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0770 · Cited by 310
Self-citationWeeke, L. C., Groenendaal, F., Mudigonda, K., Blennow, M., Lequin, M. H., Meiners, L. C., van Haastert, I. C., Benders, M. J., Hallberg, B., & de Vries, L. S. (2018) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.043 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutherford, M., Counsell, S., Allsop, J., Boardman, J., Kapellou, O., Larkman, D., Hajnal, J., Edwards, D., & Cowan, F.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1004-1014
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2043216371
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.