Cited by 120Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesCongenital Heart Disease StudiesVascular anomalies and interventions

Association between fetal lymphedema and congenital cardiovascular defects in Turner syndrome

Loscalzo, M. L.·2005·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Turner syndrome (TS) is associated with congenital cardiovascular defects (CCVDs), most commonly bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and aortic coarctation (COARC), congenital renal anomalies, and fetal lymphedema. It has been theorized that compressive or obstructive effects of fetal lymphedema may actually cause cardiovascular and renal dysmorphogenesis in TS. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a specific association between a history of fetal lymphedema and CCVDs in monosomy X, or TS, independent of karyotype or general severity of the phenotype. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 134 girls and women who have TS (mean age: 30 years) and were clinically evaluated for evidence of fetal lymphedema, classified as central (signified by the presence of neck webbing) or peripheral (current or perinatal, or dysplastic fingernails). The presence of BAV and/or COARC was detected by magnetic resonance imaging combined with echocardiography, and renal anomalies were determined by ultrasound. RESULTS: There is a strong association between developmental central lymphedema, signified by neck webbing, and the presence of BAV (chi2 = 10) and COARC (chi2 = 8). The association between webbed neck and CCVDs was independent of karyotype. There was, in contrast, no significant association between renal anomalies and webbed neck or CCVDs. CONCLUSIONS: The strong, statistically significant association between neck webbing and the presence of BAV and COARC in TS suggests a pathogenetic connection between fetal lymphatic obstruction and defective aortic development. The presence of neck webbing in TS should alert the clinician to the possibility of congenital cardiovascular defects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2004-1369

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 120

Authors
Loscalzo, M. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Loscalzo, M. L.
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
732-735
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2003019597
Cited by
120
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
Turner syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of the aorta, webbed neck, monosomy X, lymphatic obstruction, aortic development, renal anomalies, dysmorphogenesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aortic Coarctation, Aortic Valve, Female, Fetal Diseases, Genotype, Humans, Kidney, Lymphedema, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review