Association between fetal lymphedema and congenital cardiovascular defects in Turner syndrome
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Turner syndrome (TS) is associated with congenital cardiovascular defects (CCVDs), most commonly bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and aortic coarctation (COARC), congenital renal anomalies, and fetal lymphedema. It has been theorized that compressive or obstructive effects of fetal lymphedema may actually cause cardiovascular and renal dysmorphogenesis in TS. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a specific association between a history of fetal lymphedema and CCVDs in monosomy X, or TS, independent of karyotype or general severity of the phenotype. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 134 girls and women who have TS (mean age: 30 years) and were clinically evaluated for evidence of fetal lymphedema, classified as central (signified by the presence of neck webbing) or peripheral (current or perinatal, or dysplastic fingernails). The presence of BAV and/or COARC was detected by magnetic resonance imaging combined with echocardiography, and renal anomalies were determined by ultrasound. RESULTS: There is a strong association between developmental central lymphedema, signified by neck webbing, and the presence of BAV (chi2 = 10) and COARC (chi2 = 8). The association between webbed neck and CCVDs was independent of karyotype. There was, in contrast, no significant association between renal anomalies and webbed neck or CCVDs. CONCLUSIONS: The strong, statistically significant association between neck webbing and the presence of BAV and COARC in TS suggests a pathogenetic connection between fetal lymphatic obstruction and defective aortic development. The presence of neck webbing in TS should alert the clinician to the possibility of congenital cardiovascular defects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neck webbing and an increased anterior-posterior thoracic diameter are strong predictors of arterial and venous anomalies in TS.
“Neck webbing and an increased anterior–posterior thoracic diameter are strong predictors of arterial and venous anomalies in TS.390,392,393”
From Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome. (2024) · cites this paper as [393]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 120
- Authors
- Loscalzo, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Loscalzo, M. L.
- Venue
- PEDIATRICS
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 732-735
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2003019597
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
- Keywords
- Turner syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of the aorta, webbed neck, monosomy X, lymphatic obstruction, aortic development, renal anomalies, dysmorphogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aortic Coarctation, Aortic Valve, Female, Fetal Diseases, Genotype, Humans, Kidney, Lymphedema, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review