The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Smoking in the Movies Increases Adolescent Smoking: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Objective. Despite voluntary restrictions prohibiting direct and indirect cigarette marketing to youth and paid product placement, tobacco use remains prevalent in movies. This article presents a systematic review of the evidence on the nature and effect of smoking in the movies on adolescents (and others). Methodology. We performed a comprehensive literature review. Results. We identified 40 studies. Smoking in the movies decreased from 1950 to ∼1990 and then increased rapidly. In 2002, smoking in movies was as common as it was in 1950. Movies rarely depict the negative health outcomes associated with smoking and contribute to increased perceptions of smoking prevalence and the benefits of smoking. Movie smoking is presented as adult behavior. Exposure to movie smoking makes viewers' attitudes and beliefs about smoking and smokers more favorable and has a dose-response relationship with adolescent smoking behavior. Parental restrictions on R-rated movies significantly reduces youth exposure to movie smoking and subsequent smoking uptake. Beginning in 2002, the total amount of smoking in movies was greater in youth-rated (G/PG/PG-13) films than adult-rated (R) films, significantly increasing adolescent exposure to movie smoking. Viewing antismoking advertisements before viewing movie smoking seems to blunt the stimulating effects of movie smoking on adolescent smoking. Conclusions. Strong empirical evidence indicates that smoking in movies increases adolescent smoking initiation. Amending the movie-rating system to rate movies containing smoking as “R” should reduce adolescent exposure to smoking and subsequent smoking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Older and Newer Media: Patterns of Use and Effects on Adolescents' Health and Well‐Being
Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x · Cited by 272
How does the alcohol industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review
Savell, E., Fooks, G., & Gilmore, A. B. (2016) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13048 · Cited by 257
How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review
Savell, E., Gilmore, A. B., & Fooks, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087389 · Cited by 255
Media/marketing influences on adolescent and young adult substance abuse
Jackson, K. M., Janssen, T., & Gabrielli, J. (2018) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-018-0199-6 · Cited by 116
Nan, X., & Zhao, X. (2016) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1023958 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlesworth, A., & Glantz, S. A.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1516-1528
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2155142652
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smoking in the Movies Increases Adolescent Smoking: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2005-0141
- The paper
- Charlesworth, A., & Glantz, S. A. (2005). Smoking in the Movies Increases Adolescent Smoking: A Review. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.