Cited by 229Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Celiac Disease: Evaluation of the Diagnosis and Dietary Compliance in Canadian Children

Rashid, Mohsin, Cranney, Ann, Zarkadas, Marion, Graham, Ian D., Switzer, Connie, Case, Shelley, Molloy, Mavis, Warren, Ralph E. +2 more·2005·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives We sought to characterize the clinical features at presentation as well as the associated disorders, family history, and evaluation of compliance with a gluten-free diet in children with celiac disease from across Canada. Study design All members (n = 5240) of the Canadian Celiac Association were surveyed with a questionnaire. Of the 2849 respondents with biopsy-confirmed celiac disease, 168 who were Results The mean age when surveyed was 9.1 +/- 4.1 years, and 58% were female. Median age at diagnosis was 3.0 years with a range of 1 to 15 years. Presenting symptoms included abdominal pain (90%), weight loss (71%), diarrhea (65%), weakness (64%), nausea/vomiting (53%), anemia (40%), mood swings (37%), and constipation (30%). Almost one third of families consulted > or = 2 pediatricians before confirmation of the diagnosis. Before the recognition of celiac disease, other diagnoses received by these children included anemia (15%), irritable bowel syndrome (11%), gastroesophageal reflux (8%), stress (8%), and peptic ulcer disease (4%). A serological test was performed to screen for celiac disease in 70% of those in this population. Eight percent had either type 1 diabetes mellitus or a first-degree relative with celiac disease. Almost all respondents (95%) reported strict adherence to a gluten-free diet, and 89% noted improved health. Reactions after accidental gluten ingestion developed in 54% of the children between 0.5 and 60 hours after ingestion with a median of 2…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2005-0904

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rashid, M., Cranney, A., Zarkadas, M., Graham, I. D., Switzer, C., Case, S., Molloy, M., Warren, R. E., Burrows, V., & Butzner, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Canadian Celiac Association (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Kelowna General Hospital (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
116
Issue
6
Pages
e754-e759
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2125637093
Cited by
229
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Celiac Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
celiac disease, children, gluten-free diet compliance, age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, serological screening, dietary adherence, quality of life, family impact, type 1 diabetes, family history (medicine), Canadian children, pediatric celiac disease, Canada, irritable bowel syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Canada, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review