The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beneficial Effects of Breast Milk in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on the Developmental Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 18 Months of Age
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Beneficial effects of breast milk on cognitive skills and behavior ratings have been demonstrated previously in term and very low birth weight infants. Extremely low birth weight infants are known to be at increased risk for developmental and behavior morbidities. The benefits of breast milk that is ingested in the NICU by extremely low birth weight infants on development and behavior have not been evaluated previously. METHODS. Nutrition data including enteral and parenteral feeds were collected prospectively, and follow-up assessments of 1035 extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months’ corrected age were completed at 15 sites that were participants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network Glutamine Trial between October 14, 1999, and June 25, 2001. Total volume of breast milk feeds (mL/kg per day) during hospitalization was calculated. Neonatal characteristics and morbidities, interim history, and neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months’ corrected age were assessed. RESULTS. There were 775 (74.9%) infants in the breast milk and 260 (25.1%) infants in the no breast milk group. Infants in the breast milk group were similar to those in the no breast milk group in every neonatal characteristic and morbidity, including number of days of hospitalization. Mean age of first day of breast milk for the breast milk infants was 9.3 ± 9 days. Infants in the breast milk group began to ingest non–breast milk formula later (22.8 vs 7.3 days) compared with the non–breast milk group. Age at achieving full enteral feeds was similar between the breast milk and non–breast milk groups (29.0 ± 18 vs 27.4 ± 15). Energy intakes of 107.5 kg/day and 105.9 kg/day during the hospitalization did not differ between the breast milk and non–breast milk groups, respectively. At discharge, 30.6% of infants in the breast milk group still were receiving breast milk. Mothers in the breast milk group were significantly more likely to be white (42% vs 27%), be married (50% vs 30%), have a college degree (22% vs 6%), and have private health insurance (34% vs 18%) compared with the no breast milk group. Mothers who were black, had a low household income (≤$20000), or had higher parity were less likely to provide breast milk feeds. The analysis of outcomes between the any human milk and no human milk groups were adjusted for maternal age, maternal education, marital status, race/ethnicity, and the other standard covariates. Children in the breast milk group were more likely to have a Bayley Mental Development Index ≥85, higher mean Bayley Psychomotor Development Index, and higher Bayley Behavior Rating Scale percentile scores for orientation/engagement, motor regulation, and total score. There were no differences in the rates of moderate to severe cerebral palsy or blindness or hearing impairment between the 2 study groups. There were no differences in the mean weight (10.4 kg vs 10.4 kg), length (80.5 cm vs 80.5 cm), or head circumference (46.8 cm vs 46.6 cm) for the breast milk and no breast milk groups, respectively, at 18 months. Multivariate analyses, adjusting for confounders, confirmed a significant independent association of breast milk on all 4 primary outcomes: the mean Bayley (Mental Development Index, Psychomotor Development Index, Behavior Rating Scale, and incidence of rehospitalization). For every 10-mL/kg per day increase in breast milk ingestion, the Mental Development Index increased by 0.53 points, the Psychomotor Development Index increased by 0.63 points, the Behavior Rating Scale percentile score increased by 0.82 points, and the likelihood of rehospitalization decreased by 6%. In an effort to identify a threshold effect of breast milk on Bayley Mental Development Index and Psychomotor Development Index scores and Behavior Rating Scale percentile scores, the mean volume of breast milk per kilogram per day during the hospitalization was calculated, and infants in the breast milk group were divided into quintiles of breast milk ingestion adjusted for confounders. Overall, the differences across the feeding quintiles of Mental Development Index and Psychomotor Development Index were significant. There was a 14.0% difference in Behavior Rating Scale scores between the lowest and highest quintiles. For the outcomes (Mental Development Index, Psychomotor Development Index, Behavior Rating Scale, and Rehospitalization <1 year), only the values for the >80th percentile quintile of breast milk feeding were significantly different from the no breast milk values. In our adjusted regression analyses, every 10 mL/kg per day breast milk contributed 0.53 points to the Bayley Mental Development Index; therefore, the impact of breast milk ingestion during the hospitalization for infants in the highest quintile (110 mL/kg per day) on the Bayley Mental Development Index would be 10 × 0.53, or 5.3 points. CONCLUSIONS. An increase of 5 points potentially would optimize outcomes and decrease costs by decreasing the number of very low birth weight children who require special education services. The societal implications of a 5-point potential difference (one third of an SD) in IQ are substantial. The potential long-term benefit of receiving breast milk in the NICU for extremely low birth weight infants may be to optimize cognitive potential and reduce the need for early intervention and special education services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Papile, L.-A., Burstein, J., Burstein, R., & Koffler, H. (1978) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0 · Cited by 6,430
Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk
Breastfeeding, S. O. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491 · Cited by 5,323
Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk
Work Group on Breastfeeding (1997) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.100.6.1035 · Cited by 1,234
Breast milk and subsequent intelligence quotient in children born preterm
Lucas, A., Morley, R., Cole, T. J., Lister, G., & Leeson-Payne, C. (1992) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)91329-7 · Cited by 1,222
Outcomes in Young Adulthood for Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Hack, M., Flannery, D. J., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Borawski, E., & Klein, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010856 · Cited by 1,204
Vohr, B. R., Wright, L. L., Dusick, A. M., Mele, L., Verter, J., Steichen, J. J., Simon, N. P., Wilson, D. C., Broyles, S., Bauer, C. R., et al. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.105.6.1216 · Cited by 1,142
Self-citationProtective effect of breast feeding against infection.
Howie, P. W., Forsyth, J. S., Ogston, S. A., Clark, A., & Florey, C. D. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6716.11 · Cited by 876
Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient
Lucas, A., Morley, R., & Cole, T. J. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1481 · Cited by 702
Bourre, J.-M., Francois, M., Youyou, A., Dumont, O., Piciotti, M., Pascal, G., & Durand, G. (1989) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/119.12.1880 · Cited by 675
Arachidonic acid status correlates with first year growth in preterm infants.
Carlson, S. E., Werkman, S. H., Peeples, J. M., Cooke, R. J., & Tolley, E. A. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.3.1073 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk
BREASTFEEDING, S. O., Eidelman, A. I., Schanler, R. J., Johnston, M., Landers, S., Noble, L., Szucs, K., & Viehmann, L. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552 · Cited by 4,357
O'Brien, K., Robson, K., Bracht, M., Cruz, M., Lui, K., Alvaro, R., da Silva, O., Monterrosa, L., Narvey, M., Ng, E., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30039-7 · Cited by 593
Serenius, F., Källén, K., Blennow, M., Ewald, U., Fellman, V., Holmström, G., Lindberg, E., Lundqvist, P., Maršál, K., Norman, M., et al. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3786 · Cited by 558
Impact of a Transition Home Program on Rehospitalization Rates of Preterm Infants
Vohr, B., McGowan, E., Keszler, L., Alksninis, B., O'Donnell, M., Hawes, K., & Tucker, R. (2017) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.025 · Cited by 79
Self-citationMånsson, J., Fellman, V., Stjernqvist, K., & the EXPRESS Study Group (authors) (2015) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.12937 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Vohr, B. R., Poindexter, B. B., Dusick, A. M., McKinley, L. T., Wright, L. L., Langer, J. C., Poole, W. K., & for the NICHD Neonatal Research Network
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e115-e123
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2141088727
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beneficial Effects of Breast Milk in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on the Developmental Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 18 Months of Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2005-2382
- The paper
- Vohr, B. R., Poindexter, B. B., Dusick, A. M., McKinley, L. T., Wright, L. L., Langer, J. C., Poole, W. K., & for the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. (2006). Beneficial Effects of Breast Milk in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on the Developmental Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 18 Months of Age. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.