Cited by 20Injury Epidemiology and PreventionAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsTraffic and Road Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cost-Outcome Analysis of Booster Seats for Auto Occupants Aged 4 to 7 Years

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this work was to analyze the societal return on investment in booster seats and in laws requiring their use in the United States. Booster seats reduce crash-related injury. Their use is mandatory for vehicle occupants aged 4 to 7 years in most of the United States. This study estimates the injury cost savings attributable to booster seat use. METHODS. Seat cost came from pricing on the Web and at retailers. Costs of passing and enforcing a legal mandate were estimated as a percentage of the costs of seat use. Injury risk when belted absent a seat was computed from national probability samples of crashes in the last years before booster seats entered into general use (1993–1999). Published estimates were used of the percentage of reduction in injuries achieved with booster seats, the mix of diagnoses reduced, and injury cost by diagnosis. The computations used a 3% discount rate. We studied the net cost per quality-adjusted life year saved, benefit-cost ratio, and net savings per seat. RESULTS. A booster seat costs $30 plus $167 for maintenance and time spent on installation and use. This investment saves $1854 per seat, a return on investment of 9.4 to 1. Even lower bound estimates in sensitivity analysis indicated that society would benefit from the use of booster seats. Seat laws offer a return of 8.6 to 1. CONCLUSIONS. Belt-positioning booster seats offer a sound return on investment. Booster seat use laws should be passed, publicized, and enforced nationwide.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2006-1328

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Durbin DR, Arbogast KB, Moll EK. Seat belt syndrome in children: A case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17;474–477 · DOI
  2. Ebel BE, Koepsell TD, Bennett EE, Rivera FP. Too small for a seatbelt: Predictors of booster seat use by child passengers. Pediatrics. 2003;111:323–327 · DOI
  3. Durbin DR, Elliott MR, Winston FK. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. JAMA. 2003;289;2835–2840 · DOI
  4. Miller TR, Pindus NM, Douglass JB, Rossman SB. Databook on Nonfatal Injury: Incidence, Costs, and Consequences. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press; 1995
  5. Miller TR. Costs and functional consequences of United States roadway crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 1993;25:593–607 · DOI
  6. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1997
  8. Hendrie D, Miller TR, Orlando M, et al. Child and family safety device affordability by country income level: An 18-country comparison. Inj Prev. 2004;10;338–343 · DOI
  9. Miller TR. Assessing the burden of injury: Progress and pitfalls. In: Mohan D, Tiwari G, eds. Injury Prevention and Control. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; 2000:49–70 · DOI
  10. Downing PB. Policy consequences of indirect regulatory costs. Public Policy. 1981;29:507–526
  11. Miller TR, Zaloshnja E, Sheppard MA. Are booster seats needed: Comparing occupant outcomes ages 4–7 versus 8–13. 46th Annual Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Sep 29 to Oct 2, 2002. Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 2002:239–259
  12. Zaloshnja E, Miller TR, Romano EO, Spicer RS. Crash costs by body part injured, fracture involvement, and threat to life severity, United States, 2000. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36;415–427 · DOI
  13. Miller TR, Levy DT. Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: Eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. Med Care. 2000;38;562–582 · DOI
  14. Zaza S, Sleet DA, Thompson RS, Sosin DM, Bolen JC. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase use of child safety seats. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21(4 suppl):31–47 · DOI
  15. Blomquist G. Motorist use of safety equipment: Expected benefits or risk incompetence. J. Risk Unc. 1991;4:135–152 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miller, T. R., Zaloshnja, E., & Hendrie, D.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
118
Issue
5
Pages
1994-1998
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2027588471
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • U.S. Public Health Service (240-98-0006)
  • Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
booster seats, child passenger safety, occupant injury, return on investment, cost per quality-adjusted life year, benefit-cost ratio, injury prevention policy
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant Equipment, Cost Savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review