The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrops Fetalis: A Retrospective Review of Cases Reported to a Large National Database and Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Death
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. The objectives were (1) to identify the causes for hydrops fetalis neonates admitted for neonatal intensive care with the diagnosis of hydrops fetalis and (2) to identify the risk factors associated with death. METHODS. A retrospective review of a large national data set was performed. RESULTS. There were a total of 253651 discharges from 162 NICUs in the database; 598 patients were identified with a report of hydrops fetalis. The most common associated diagnoses were congenital heart problems (13.7%), abnormalities in heart rate (10.4%), twin-to-twin transfusion (9%), congenital anomalies (8.7%), chromosomal abnormalities (7.5%), congenital viral infections (6.7%), congenital anemia (5%), and congenital chylothorax (3.2%). Of those 598 neonates, 115 were transferred either to another hospital or to another service, 215 died before discharge, and 267 were discharged from the hospital. One patient did not have a discharge type listed and was not included in the outcome analysis. Mortality rates were highest among neonates with congenital anomalies (57.7%) and lowest among neonates with congenital chylothorax (5.9%). Factors that were associated independently with death in logistic regression analyses were younger gestational age, low 5-minute Apgar score, and need for high levels of support during the first day after birth (higher levels of inspired oxygen support and more often treated with high-frequency ventilation). CONCLUSIONS. The risk of death among neonates with hydrops fetalis depends on the underlying diagnosis and is highest for those who are born more prematurely and those who are most ill immediately after birth. Information from this large study should prove useful for planning prospective studies and providing prenatal counseling to parents with an affected fetus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Garges, H. P., Moody, M. A., Cotten, C. M., Smith, P. B., Tiffany, K. F., Lenfestey, R., Li, J. S., Fowler, V. G., & Benjamin, D. K. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1132 · Cited by 351
Turner syndrome: evaluation of prenatal diagnosis in 19 European registries
Baena, N., De Vigan, C., Cariati, E., Clementi, M., Stoll, C., Caballín, M. R., Guitart, M., & The Euroscan working group (2004) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30092 · Cited by 160
Cited by
The fetal brain sparing response to hypoxia: physiological mechanisms
Giussani, D. A. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp271099 · Cited by 397
RETIRED: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Clinical Guideline #7: nonimmune hydrops fetalis
Norton, M. E., Chauhan, S. P., & Dashe, J. S. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.018 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrams, M. E., Meredith, K. S., Kinnard, P., & Clark, R. H.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-89
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2087509707
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrops Fetalis: A Retrospective Review of Cases Reported to a Large National Database and Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2006-3680
- The paper
- Abrams, M. E., Meredith, K. S., Kinnard, P., & Clark, R. H. (2007). Hydrops Fetalis: A Retrospective Review of Cases Reported to a Large National Database and Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Death. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.