The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Maternity-Care Practices on Breastfeeding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to assess the impact of “Baby-Friendly” hospital practices and other maternity-care practices experienced by mothers on breastfeeding duration. METHODS. This analysis of the Infant Feeding Practices Study II focused on mothers who initiated breastfeeding and intended prenatally to breastfeed for >2 months, with complete data on all variables (n = 1907). Predictor variables included indicators of 6 “Baby-Friendly” practices (breastfeeding initiation within 1 hour of birth, giving only breast milk, rooming in, breastfeeding on demand, no pacifiers, fostering breastfeeding support groups) along with several other maternity-care practices. The main outcome measure was breastfeeding termination before 6 weeks. RESULTS. Only 8.1% of the mothers experienced all 6 “Baby-Friendly” practices. The practices most consistently associated with breastfeeding beyond 6 weeks were initiation within 1 hour of birth, giving only breast milk, and not using pacifiers. Bringing the infant to the room for feeding at night if not rooming in and not giving pain medications to the mother during delivery were also protective against early breastfeeding termination. Compared with the mothers who experienced all 6 “Baby-Friendly” practices, mothers who experienced none were ∼13 times more likely to stop breastfeeding early. Additional practices decreased the risk for early termination. CONCLUSIONS. Increased “Baby-Friendly” hospital practices, along with several other maternity-care practices, improve the chances of breastfeeding beyond 6 weeks. The need to work with hospitals to implement these practices continues to exist, as illustrated by the small proportion of mothers who reported experiencing all 6 of the “Baby-Friendly” hospital practices measured in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Policies
(2011) · doi:10.17226/13124 · Cited by 452
Factors Associated with Breastfeeding Initiation and Continuation: A Meta-Analysis
Cohen, S. S., Alexander, D. D., Krebs, N. F., Young, B. E., Cabana, M. D., Erdmann, P., Hays, N. P., Bezold, C. P., Levin-Sparenberg, E., Turini, M., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.008 · Cited by 432
Bollag, L., Lim, G., Sultan, P., Habib, A. S., Landau, R., Zakowski, M., Tiouririne, M., Bhambhani, S., & Carvalho, B. (2021) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005257 · Cited by 378
Baby-Friendly Hospital Practices and Meeting Exclusive Breastfeeding Intention
Perrine, C. G., Scanlon, K. S., Li, R., Odom, E., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3633 · Cited by 257
Self-citationPredictors of Non-Attendance to the Postpartum Follow-up Visit
Wilcox, A., Levi, E. E., & Garrett, J. M. (2016) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-016-2184-9 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- DiGirolamo, A. M., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., & Fein, S. B.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2008-10-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- Supplement_2
- Pages
- S43-S49
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2157811974
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Maternity-Care Practices on Breastfeeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2008-1315e
- The paper
- DiGirolamo, A. M., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., & Fein, S. B. (2008). Effect of Maternity-Care Practices on Breastfeeding. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1315e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.