The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Status Scale: New Pediatric Outcome Measure
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal was to create a functional status outcome measure for large outcome studies that is well defined, quantitative, rapid, reliable, minimally dependent on subjective assessments, and applicable to hospitalized pediatric patients across a wide range of ages and inpatient environments. METHODS: Functional Status Scale (FSS) domains of functioning included mental status, sensory functioning, communication, motor functioning, feeding, and respiratory status, categorized from normal (score = 1) to very severe dysfunction (score = 5). The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System II (ABAS II) established construct validity and calibration within domains. Seven institutions provided PICU patients within 24 hours before or after PICU discharge, high-risk non-PICU patients within 24 hours after admission, and technology-dependent children. Primary care nurses completed the ABAS II. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 836 children, with a mean FSS score of 10.3 (SD: 4.4), were studied. Eighteen percent had the minimal possible FSS score of 6, 44% had FSS scores of ≥10, 14% had FSS scores of ≥15, and 6% had FSS scores of ≥20. Each FSS domain was associated with mean ABAS II scores (P < .0001). Cells in each domain were collapsed and reweighted, which improved correlations with ABAS II scores (P < .001 for improvements). Discrimination was very good for moderate and severe dysfunction (ABAS II categories) and improved with FSS weighting. Intraclass correlations of original and weighted total FSS scores were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FSS met our objectives and is well suited for large outcome studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Cited by
Millar, M. M., Olson, L. M., VanBuren, J. M., Richards, R., Pollack, M. M., Holubkov, R., Berg, R. A., Carcillo, J. A., McQuillen, P. S., Meert, K. L., et al. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01421-8 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollack, M. M., Holubkov, R., Glass, P., Dean, J. M., Meert, K. L., Zimmerman, J., Anand, K. J. S., Carcillo, J., Newth, C. J. L., Harrison, R., Willson, D. F., Nicholson, C., & and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e18-e28
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2159639142
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Status Scale: New Pediatric Outcome Measure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2008-1987
- The paper
- Pollack, M. M., Holubkov, R., Glass, P., Dean, J. M., Meert, K. L., Zimmerman, J., Anand, K. J. S., Carcillo, J., Newth, C. J. L., Harrison, R., Willson, D. F., Nicholson, C., & and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. (2009). Functional Status Scale: New Pediatric Outcome Measure. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.