Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Prognosis for Childhood Constipation: Clinical Outcomes in Adulthood

Bongers, Marloes E. J., van Wijk, Michiel P., Reitsma, Johannes B., Benninga, Marc A.·2010·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines long-term prognoses for children with constipation in adulthood and identifies prognostic factors associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a Dutch tertiary hospital, children (5–18 years of age) who were diagnosed as having functional constipation were eligible for inclusion. After a 6-week treatment protocol, prospective follow-up evaluations were conducted at 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Good clinical outcomes were defined as ≥3 bowel movements per week for ≥4 weeks, with ≤2 fecal incontinence episodes per month, irrespective of laxative use. RESULTS: A total of 401 children (260 boys; median age: 8 years [interquartile range: 6–9 years]) were included, with a median follow-up period of 11 years (interquartile range: 9–13 years). The dropout rate during follow-up was 15%. Good clinical outcomes were achieved by 80% of patients at 16 years of age. Thereafter, this proportion remained constant at 75%. Poor clinical outcomes at adult age were associated with: older age at onset (odds ratio [OR]: 1.15 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.30]; P = .04), longer delay between onset and first visit to our outpatient clinic (OR: 1.24 [95% CI: 1.10–1.40]; P = .001), and lower defecation frequency at study entry (OR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.84–1.00]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: One-fourth of children with functional constipation continued to experience symptoms at adult age. Certain risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in adulthood were identified. Referral to a specialized clinic should be considered at an early stage for children who are unresponsive to first-line treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2009-1009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Bongers, M. E. J., van Wijk, M. P., Reitsma, J. B., & Benninga, M. A.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
e156-e162
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2147995336
Cited by
264
References
28
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Prognosis for Childhood Constipation: Clinical Outcomes in Adulthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2009-1009
The paper
Bongers, M. E. J., van Wijk, M. P., Reitsma, J. B., & Benninga, M. A. (2010). Long-Term Prognosis for Childhood Constipation: Clinical Outcomes in Adulthood. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.