Cited by 223Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents

Gopinath, Bamini, Hardy, Louise L., Baur, Louise A., Burlutsky, George, Mitchell, Paul·2012·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviors (television viewing, computer and video-game usage, and reading) with health-related QoL. METHODS: Of 2353 children surveyed (median age: 12.7 years), 1216 were resurveyed 5 years later, and 475 were newly recruited into the study (N = 1691). Children completed detailed activity questionnaires. Health-related QoL was assessed by using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, after multivariable adjustment, adolescents in the highest versus lowest tertile of time spent in outdoor physical activity and television viewing had a higher (Ptrend = .001) and lower (Ptrend = .0003) total PedsQL score, respectively. Adolescents who remained in the highest tertiles compared with those in the lowest tertiles of total physical activity over the 5 years had significantly higher scores in the following areas: total (Ptrend = .04), physical summary (Ptrend = .0001), and social (Ptrend = .02) domains. Conversely, those in the highest versus lowest tertile of screen-viewing time during follow-up reported significantly lower values in the following areas: total score (6.34-unit difference), physical summary (4.86-unit difference), psychosocial summary (7.09-unit difference), and emotional (8.33-unit difference) and school (9.78-unit difference) domains. CONCLUSIONS: Regular physical activity over the long-term was associated with higher perceived health-related QoL among adolescents. Conversely, lower PedsQL scores were observed among those who spent the most time in screen-viewing activities. Improved understanding of these relationships could help in developing interventions to promote general well-being among adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2011-3637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 223

Authors
Gopinath, B., Hardy, L. L., Baur, L. A., Burlutsky, G., & Mitchell, P.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
e167-e174
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2103528213
Cited by
223
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical activity, sedentary behavior, health-related quality of life, adolescents, television viewing, screen time, video games, computer use, outdoor physical activity, longitudinal change, PedsQL
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Analysis of Variance, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dancing, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Quality of Life, Sports, Television, Exercise, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Video Games, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review