Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviors (television viewing, computer and video-game usage, and reading) with health-related QoL. METHODS: Of 2353 children surveyed (median age: 12.7 years), 1216 were resurveyed 5 years later, and 475 were newly recruited into the study (N = 1691). Children completed detailed activity questionnaires. Health-related QoL was assessed by using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, after multivariable adjustment, adolescents in the highest versus lowest tertile of time spent in outdoor physical activity and television viewing had a higher (Ptrend = .001) and lower (Ptrend = .0003) total PedsQL score, respectively. Adolescents who remained in the highest tertiles compared with those in the lowest tertiles of total physical activity over the 5 years had significantly higher scores in the following areas: total (Ptrend = .04), physical summary (Ptrend = .0001), and social (Ptrend = .02) domains. Conversely, those in the highest versus lowest tertile of screen-viewing time during follow-up reported significantly lower values in the following areas: total score (6.34-unit difference), physical summary (4.86-unit difference), psychosocial summary (7.09-unit difference), and emotional (8.33-unit difference) and school (9.78-unit difference) domains. CONCLUSIONS: Regular physical activity over the long-term was associated with higher perceived health-related QoL among adolescents. Conversely, lower PedsQL scores were observed among those who spent the most time in screen-viewing activities. Improved understanding of these relationships could help in developing interventions to promote general well-being among adolescents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fourteen studies identified in this systematic scoping review measured both ST and GT.
“Fourteen studies identified in this systematic scoping review measured both ST and GT [234–238, 242–250].”
From Psychological impacts of “screen time” and “green time” for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as [235]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 223
- Authors
- Gopinath, B., Hardy, L. L., Baur, L. A., Burlutsky, G., & Mitchell, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2012-07-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e167-e174
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2103528213
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- physical activity, sedentary behavior, health-related quality of life, adolescents, television viewing, screen time, video games, computer use, outdoor physical activity, longitudinal change, PedsQL
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Analysis of Variance, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dancing, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Quality of Life, Sports, Television, Exercise, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Video Games, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review