The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Parent-Focused Intervention to Reduce Infant Obesity Risk Behaviors: A Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a parent-focused intervention on infants’ obesity-risk behaviors and BMI. METHODS: This cluster randomized controlled trial recruited 542 parents and their infants (mean age 3.8 months at baseline) from 62 first-time parent groups. Parents were offered six 2-hour dietitian-delivered sessions over 15 months focusing on parental knowledge, skills, and social support around infant feeding, diet, physical activity, and television viewing. Control group parents received 6 newsletters on nonobesity-focused themes; all parents received usual care from child health nurses. The primary outcomes of interest were child diet (3 × 24-hour diet recalls), child physical activity (accelerometry), and child TV viewing (parent report). Secondary outcomes included BMI z-scores (measured). Data were collected when children were 4, 9, and 20 months of age. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed that, compared with controls, intervention group children consumed fewer grams of noncore drinks (mean difference = –4.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –7.92 to –0.99; P = .01) and were less likely to consume any noncore drinks (odds ratio = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.95; P = .034) midintervention (mean age 9 months). At intervention conclusion (mean age 19.8 months), intervention group children consumed fewer grams of sweet snacks (mean difference = –3.69; 95% CI: –6.41 to –0.96; P = .008) and viewed fewer daily minutes of television (mean difference = –15.97: 95% CI: –25.97 to –5.96; P = .002). There was little statistical evidence of differences in fruit, vegetable, savory snack, or water consumption or in BMI z-scores or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention resulted in reductions in sweet snack consumption and television viewing in 20-month-old children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350
Interventions for preventing obesity in children
Waters, E., de Silva-Sanigorski, A., Burford, B. J., Brown, T., Campbell, K. J., Gao, Y., Armstrong, R., Prosser, L., & Summerbell, C. D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001871.pub3 · Cited by 1,455
Self-citationBias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done?
Eldridge, S., Kerry, S., & Torgerson, D. J. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b4006 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Downing, K. L., Hnatiuk, J. A., Hinkley, T., Salmon, J., & Hesketh, K. D. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096634 · Cited by 102
Self-citationOlsen, N. J., Østergaard, J. N., Bjerregaard, L. G., Høy, T. V., Kierkegaard, L., Michaelsen, K. F., Sørensen, T. I. A., Grønbæk, M. K., Bruun, J. M., & Heitmann, B. L. (2024) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13641 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, K. J., Lioret, S., McNaughton, S. A., Crawford, D. A., Salmon, J., Ball, K., McCallum, Z., Gerner, B. E., Spence, A. C., Cameron, A. J., Hnatiuk, J. A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Gold, L., Abbott, G., & Hesketh, K. D.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2013-04-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 652-660
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2169671739
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.