Cited by 39Global Maternal and Child HealthChild Nutrition and Water AccessPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Changes in Child Mortality Over Time Across the Wealth Gradient in Less-Developed Countries

Open access
Bendavid, Eran·2014·Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether inequalities in under-5 mortality by wealth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are growing or declining. METHODS: All Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2002 and 2012 were used to measure under-5 mortality trends in 3 wealth tertiles. Two approaches were used to estimate changes in under-5 mortality: within-survey changes from all 54 countries, and between-survey changes for 29 countries with repeated survey waves. The principal outcome measures include annual decline in mortality, and the ratio of mortality between the poorest and least-poor wealth tertiles. RESULTS: Mortality information in 85 surveys from 929 224 households and 1 267 167 women living in 54 countries was used. In the subset of 29 countries with repeat surveys, mortality declined annually by 4.36, 3.36, and 2.06 deaths per 1000 live births among the poorest, middle, and least-poor tertiles, respectively (P = .031 for difference). The mortality ratio declined from 1.68 to 1.48 during the study period (P = .006 for trend). In the complete set of 85 surveys, the mortality ratio declined in 64 surveys (from 2.11 to 1.55), and increased in 21 surveys (from 1.58 to 1.88). Multivariate analyses suggest that convergence was associated with good governance (P ≤ .03 for 4 governance indicators: government effectiveness, rule of law, regulatory quality, and control of corruption). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, under-5 mortality in low- and middle-income countries has decreased faster among the poorest compared with the least poor between 1995 and 2012, but progress in some countries has lagged, especially with poor governance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2014-2320

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bendavid, E.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Bendavid, Eran
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
134
Issue
6
Pages
e1551-e1559
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2079098248
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG017253)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01AI084582)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
child mortality, under-five mortality, wealth inequality, social gradient, mortality trends, low- and middle-income countries, mortality convergence, good governance, government effectiveness, rule of law, regulatory quality, corruption control
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Developing Countries, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Poverty, Socioeconomic Factors, Child Mortality, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review