Hair nicotine levels in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) may increase respiratory morbidities in young children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Rapid respiratory rates, close proximity to a smoking caregiver, and increased dermal absorption of tobacco smoke components can contribute to systemic exposure. In this study, hair nicotine levels were used as a biomarker of chronic TSE in young children with BPD to determine if hair nicotine levels correlate with caregiver self-report of TSE and respiratory morbidities. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, hair nicotine levels were measured from consecutive children seen in a BPD outpatient clinic and compared with caregiver questionnaires on household smoking. The relationship between respiratory morbidities and self-reported TSE or hair nicotine level was assessed. RESULTS: The mean hair nicotine level from 117 children was 3.1 ± 13.2 ng/mg. Hair nicotine levels were significantly higher in children from smoking households by caregiver self-report compared with caregivers who reported no smoking (8.2 ± 19.7 ng/mg vs 1.8 ± 10.7; P < .001). In households that reported smoking, hair nicotine levels were higher in children with a primary caregiver who smoked compared with a primary caregiver who did not smoke. Among children with BPD who required respiratory support (n = 50), a significant association was found between higher log hair nicotine levels and increased hospitalizations and limitation of activity. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic TSE is common in children with BPD, with hair nicotine levels being more likely to detect TSE than caregiver self-report. Hair nicotine levels were also a better predictor of hospitalization and activity limitation in children with BPD who required respiratory support at outpatient presentation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prenatal exposure of children to tobacco smoke remains high in the United States and worldwide.
“Prenatal exposure of children to tobacco smoke remains high in the United States and worldwide, and caregiver questionnaires may underrepresent the actual number of children exposed to SHS. 6”
From Impact of Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine Exposure on Lung Development (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
The Hair Nicotine Levels section reports that 21 of 93 children whose caregivers reported no household smoker had hair nicotine above the exposure cutoff, supporting the concern that questionnaires may miss exposed children. The study concerns young children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia; its Demographics section reports maternal smoking during pregnancy for three subjects, but it does not establish that prenatal tobacco-smoke exposure remains high in the United States or worldwide. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCaregiver questionnaires may underrepresent the actual number of children exposed to SHS.
“Prenatal exposure of children to tobacco smoke remains high in the United States and worldwide, and caregiver questionnaires may underrepresent the actual number of children exposed to SHS. 6”
From Impact of Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine Exposure on Lung Development (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Collaco, J. M., Aherrera, A. D., Breysse, P. N., Winickoff, J. P., Klein, J. D., & McGrath-Morrow, S. A.
- Affiliations
- American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and
- Venue
- PEDIATRICS
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2015-03-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e678-e686
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- PMC
- PMC4533246
- OpenAlex
- W2056335243
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
- Johns Hopkins University
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL114800)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Keywords
- bronchopulmonary dysplasia, tobacco smoke exposure, hair nicotine, biomarkers, household smoking, respiratory morbidity, respiratory support, hospitalization, activity limitation, children
- MeSH terms
- Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hair, Humans, Infant, Male, Nicotine, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Function Tests, Retrospective Studies, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Biomarkers, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review