Behavioral Interventions for Infant Sleep Problems: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of behavioral interventions on the sleep/wakefulness of infants, parent and infant stress, and later child emotional/behavioral problems, and parent-child attachment. METHODS: A total of 43 infants (6-16 months, 63% girls) were randomized to receive either graduated extinction (n = 14), bedtime fading (n = 15), or sleep education control (n = 14). Sleep measures included parent-reported sleep diaries and infant actigraphy. Infant stress was measured via morning and afternoon salivary cortisol sampling, and mothers' self-reported mood and stress. Twelve months after intervention, mothers completed assessments of children's emotional and behavioral problems, and mother-child dyads underwent the strange situation procedure to evaluate parent-child attachment. RESULTS: Significant interactions were found for sleep latency (P < .05), number of awakenings (P < .0001), and wake after sleep onset (P = .01), with large decreases in sleep latency for graduated extinction and bedtime fading groups, and large decreases in number of awakenings and wake after sleep onset for the graduated extinction group. Salivary cortisol showed small-to-moderate declines in graduated extinction and bedtime fading groups compared with controls. Mothers' stress showed small-to-moderate decreases for the graduated extinction and bedtime fading conditions over the first month, yet no differences in mood were detected. At the 12-month follow-up, no significant differences were found in emotional and behavioral problems, and no significant differences in secure-insecure attachment styles between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both graduated extinction and bedtime fading provide significant sleep benefits above control, yet convey no adverse stress responses or long-term effects on parent-child attachment or child emotions and behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The traditional intervention strategy for ISD has been targeted and treatment-oriented, aiming to improve disrupted parental sleep by eliminating infant 'sleep problems'.
“In contrast the traditional intervention strategy for ISD has been targeted and treatment-oriented, aiming to improve disrupted parental sleep by eliminating infant ‘sleep problems’ [22–24].”
From Development and evaluation of ‘Sleep, Baby & You’—An approach to supporting parental well-being and responsive infant caregiving (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Treatment-oriented interventions often involve extinction techniques applied to infants who are causing parental sleep disruption.
“Treatment-oriented interventions often involve extinction techniques applied to infants who are causing parental sleep disruption [22,23,25–27].”
From Development and evaluation of ‘Sleep, Baby & You’—An approach to supporting parental well-being and responsive infant caregiving (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
To date strategies for resolving the effects of normal infant sleep behaviour on parental wellbeing have focussed on 'fixing the baby' via the development and testing of interventions to prolong infant sleep, prevent infants from signalling at night, or treat presumed organic disorders such as Gastro-oesophageal Reflux.
“To date strategies for resolving the effects of normal infant sleep behaviour on parental wellbeing have focussed on ‘fixing the baby’ via the development and testing of interventions to prolong infant sleep, prevent infants from signalling at night, or treat presumed organic disorders such as Gastro-oesophageal Reflux e.g. [22,38,39].”
From Development and evaluation of ‘Sleep, Baby & You’—An approach to supporting parental well-being and responsive infant caregiving (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Gradisar, M., Jackson, K., Spurrier, N. J., Gibson, J., Whitham, J., Williams, A. S., Dolby, R., & Kennaway, D. J.
- Affiliations
- School of Psychology, and
- SA Health (AU)
- Flinders University (AU)
- Women's and Children's Health Network (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- PEDIATRICS
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2016-06-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2408411987
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- infant sleep problems, behavioral interventions, sleep education, sleep latency, awakening, wake after sleep onset, salivary cortisol, maternal stress, child emotional and behavioral problems, parent-child attachment, secure attachment
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Therapy, Psychology, Child, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Infant, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Actigraphy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review